If you know of an event that you feel should be listed on our calendar, please send details to info@mjdispensaries.com ~Thank You

Latest Headlines and Information

Showing posts with label medical marijuana_. Show all posts
Showing posts with label medical marijuana_. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 9, 2011

Santa Ana Dispensaries, Collectives and Co-ops

Accesss OC Central
1833 E. 17th St., Suite 322 [map]
Santa Ana, CA 92705
Hours: Mon-Sat 11am to 8pm, Closed on SUNDAYS
Phone: 714-972-2000

Aloha Community Collective Assn
2112 E. 4th St. Unit #227 [map]
Santa Ana CA 92705
Hours: Mon-Sun 10am to 7pm
Website: http://thedopeman.com

Coastal Collective
2001 E. 4th St. Unit 205
Santa Ana, CA 92701
Hours: Mon-Sat 11am to 8pm, Sun 11am to 6pm
Phone: 714-542-2277

Greenway Healing Center
2720 S. Bristol St.. Suite #109
Santa Ana, CA 92704
Hours: Mon-Fri 10am to 8pm, Sat 10am to 7pm, Sun 11am to 5pm
Phone: 714-545-4040

Go N' Green P.C.A.
1905 E 17th St #201
Santa Ana, CA 92705
Hours: Mon-Sun 10am to 9pm
Phone: 714-766-0420

MJ's Compassionate Care
13912 Ponderosa St, Unit G
Santa Ana, CA 92705
Phone: 714-613-2191
Email: mjswild@yahoo.com

Orange Coast Premier Collective
3619 W. Pendleton Ave. Ste A
Santa Ana, CA 92704
Hours: Mon-Thu 11am to 8pm, Fri-Sat 11am to 9pm, Sun 11am to 6pm
Website: http://www.ocpcollective.org
Email: info@ocpcollective.org
Phone: 714-591-7000

Orange County Cannabis Collective
1833 E. 17th Street Ste #114
Santa Ana, CA 92705
Hours: Mon-Sat 11am-8pm, Sun 12pm-5pm
Phone: 714-476-9270

Orange Co. Patient Group Collective
2315 E. 17th Street #4 [map]
Santa Ana, CA 92705
Hours: Mon-Fri 10am to 7:45pm Sat-Sun 11am to 6:45pm
Phone: 714-547-2525

Santa Ana Patients Group
1823 E. 17th St. Suite 209 [map]
Santa Ana, CA 92705
Hours: Mon-Thu 10am to 8pm, Fri-Sat 10am to 9pm, Sun 10am-7pm
Phone: 714-568-0041

South Coast Patients Center
1202 East 17th St Suite #200 [map]
Santa Ana, CA 92701
Hours: Mon-Sat 10am to 8pm, Sun 11am to 6pm
Phone: (714) 547-4800


Covers the following zip codes in Santa Ana, California: 92701, 92702, 92703, 92704, 92705, 92706, 92707, 92711, 92712, 92725, 92735, 92799

Merchant Accounts for Dispensaries. Great Rates!

Tuesday, February 15, 2011

NEWS: California Medical Marijuana Industry Seeks to Operate "FOR PROFIT"

by W. E. Messamore

In California, medical marijuana dispensaries are required by state law to operate as non-profit "collectives" of legal medical marijuana patients who simply cover the costs of distributing the plant or edible products made from it. In the aftermath of dozens of raids on dispensaries that were illegally profiting from the sale of marijuana over the last year, the medicinal marijuana industry is calling for new laws that would allow dispensaries to operate as for-profit enterprises.

Many industry advocates are saying the raids happened as a result of vague California laws that do not clearly define proper accounting procedures for dispensaries, allowable salary levels, or illegal profiting. The Sacramento Bee reports the opinion of one Hollywood attorney specializing in marijuana cases who said: "Unfortunately 'profit' isn't defined, and there is no definition of 'nonprofit.'" And Assemblyman Tom Ammiano (D-San Francisco) says that the radically different approaches to dispensaries- which are allowed to operate in some cities, but are raided in others- shows the need for clear, statewide regulations to create a more "cohesive response."

In addition to clearer statutes, lawmakers, advocates, and industry leaders are calling for the creation of some kind of statewide oversight panel to regulate marijuana dispensaries. Sacramento lawyer, George Mull is lobbying the State Legislature to create what he's calling a "California cannabis commission" to oversee all of California's dispensaries. If the state adopts some of these measures, especially permitting California dispensaries to operate as for-profit businesses, it will end up creating rules similar to those in Colorado, another state notorious for its booming medical cannabis industry.

I actually spent the month of January in Colorado, using some of my time there to investigate its medical marijuana laws and policies. I found the medicinal marijuana industry booming in the sleepy city of Boulder, Colorado, nestled among the foothills of the Rocky Mountains. I saw many (often creatively-decorated) dispensaries nearly everywhere I travelled. My good friend and host for the month, a graduate student at the University of Colorado, even showed me a campus coupon book, which contained coupons from a local dispensary for a "FREE JOINT" with any purchase, and "$10 OFF YOUR NEXT QUARTER OUNCE." I laughed and said:

"So this is what we can look forward to if marijuana becomes legal for recreational use everywhere else over the next few years."

Despite marijuana's strictly medicinal use as far as the law is concerned, the for-profit status of Colorado dispensaries is apparent in the conspicuous commercialization of the plant there. Suppliers and licensed physicians who can charge for clinic visits also seem all-too-eager to cash in on the profits by making it easy to get a physician's recommendation for a medical marijuana card. But is commercializing the drug no better than street "drug-dealing" as one California state official commented? Big pharmaceutical companies make enormous profits from an assortment of legitimate medicines every year.

The question is: why should cannabis be any different? And if it shouldn't be, is a whole new regulatory agency the best way for California to address the problem of raids on marijuana profits, especially as it works to streamline government to address a budget in severe crisis?

Source: California Independent Voter Network

LEAP - Law Enforcement Against Prohibition - www.leap.cc

Wednesday, February 9, 2011

VIDEO: David Zink on the medical marijuana dispensary case known as PAC vs Long Beach


David Zink during public comment at the Long Beach city council meeting shares some insight into a medical marijuana dispensaries case PAC vs Long Beach. From Tuesday, February 8, 2011.

LEAP - Law Enforcement Against Prohibition - www.leap.cc

Saturday, January 15, 2011

EVENT: Medical Cannabis Conference - January 22nd 2011



http://www.cbdconference.com | The Orange County Chapter of NORML, Apothecary Genetics, GGECO University, Kush Media will be holding a one day Medical Cannabis Conference for Seniors, Medical Professionals and the Community. This conference will take place on Saturday, January 22, 2011 from 9 AM to 8 PM in Orange County, CA.

California voters passed Proposition 215 in 1996, which allowed qualified patients with a physician's recommendation to use medical marijuana legally. In 2003 Senate Bill 420 was passed and allowed patients who are not able to grow their own medicine to join patient collectives providing safe access to their medicine. In the last couple years there has been an increase in Medical Cannabis. In an effort to help further state, county, & city agencies educate and protect the public, about the proper safe use and governing legislation regarding Medical Cannabis. Educating the public about safe use with various routes of administration, dosage forms, and methods of usage are known and that correct information is being received by the public and medical community this conference is being held.

The Medical Cannabis Conference will be bringing two renowned Physicians to Orange County for their first presentations ever in this area, Dr. William Courtney and Dr. Donald Abrams.

William Courtney, M.D., has an extensive medical education; he received his Bachelor of Science from the University of Michigan, his Doctor of Medicine from Wayne State University, and his Post Doctorate in Forensic Examination and Forensic Medicine. Dr. Courtney currently has a private practice in Mendocino County, California. Dr. Courtney is currently a member of International Cannabinoid Research Society, the International Association of Cannabis as Medicine, the Society of Clinical Cannabis and Vice President of the Association Luxembourgeoise des Methodes Preventives.

Donald Abrams, M.D., is Professor of Clinical Medicine at the University of California San Francisco and Chief of Hematology/Oncology at San Francisco General Hospital. He provides Integrative Oncology consultations at the UCSF Osher Center for Integrative Medicine. He is a member of the UCSF Comprehensive Cancer Center Executive Committee and is co-chairing the Center's developing program in Symptom Management, Palliative Care and Survivorship.

Also scheduled to speak is William Britt Founder of the Association of Patient Advocates and Court Qualified Cannabis Expert, Debby Goldsberry one of the Founders of Americans for Safe Access, Lanny Swerdlow, R.N. and Director of Marijuana Anti Prohibition Project, Jeffrey C. Raber, Ph.D. of The Werc Shop, Sytze Elzinga Cannabis Research, Bret Bogue from GGECO University, Brett Stack of Marijuana Saves Lives, Cheryl Shuman from Kush Magazine, Lonnie Painter from Laguna Woods Medical Cannabis Collective, Anna Boyce, R.N. a community activist, Marla James from OC Americans for Safe Access, and Attorney Jeremy Joseph from the Unconventional Foundation for Autism.

For the conclusion of the conference there will be a screening of "What If Cannabis Cured Cancer" and a question and answer session with the documentary's Director Len Richmond.

The Orange County chapter of NORML is a nonprofit organization working since 2003 to spread knowledge about alternatives to the drug war and working to protect the rights of California medical marijuana patients. Apothecary Genetics is a multi-faceted corporation which includes GGECO University that strives to bring the most up to date information to educate people on the properties of cannabis and its medical uses, as well as the properties of hemp and our need to have these plants legalized in the United States. Kush Magazine and Daily Buds are the #1 media source and social network site for the cannabis industry.

Tuesday, November 30, 2010

NEWS: Rancho Mirage council may put off vote on medical marijuana

Rancho Mirage's City Council could vote Thursday to put an indefinite hold on the medical marijuana dispensary issue after delaying the topic three times.

City Attorney Steve Quintanilla said Monday he's requesting the delay because the city of Anaheim is appealing the court decision that led city officials to believe they might be forced to allow at least some dispensaries to operate there.

He knew this was a possibility, but, “at the last minute, they filed the papers which let me know they were serious about it.”

The council also plans a special meeting for 1 p.m. Dec. 14 so the council can vote on whether to extend a moratorium on dispensaries that is set to expire the next day.

Quintanilla said he will recommend a yearlong moratorium. The council unanimously approved three previous requests to delay the discussion from Quintanilla.

Rick Pantele, a Rancho Mirage resident and cancer survivor who uses medical marijuana under the state's voter-approved law, said he isn't surprised leaders might put the issue off further, given their pragmatic approach to the issue up to this point.

“The reality is the city attorney said in the last meeting that they're not for medical marijuana in Rancho Mirage; the only reason they're looking at it is they don't get sued,” he said.

Quintanilla said it could happen anyway, coming from a dispensary that opened in Rancho Mirage earlier this year but shut down for the moratorium. Two others want to open in the city as well.

“I guess they're getting impatient, so they have threatened to sue,” he said, though no suit had been filed as of Monday.

Jeff Lake, the attorney for the dispensaries, didn't return calls seeking comment.

Until the council vote was first delayed Oct. 21, the city appeared to be on a fast track to becoming the second Coachella Valley city, after Palm Springs, to allow some dispensaries.

It had never adopted an outright ban that the other seven cities had adopted. So staff scrambled to put together dispensary regulations when one opened in the city after getting turned down for a business permit.

A state court of appeals had recently ruled Anaheim could not use federal laws against marijuana use as the basis to ban medical dispensaries.

This led leaders to believe the city would be forced to allow some to operate in Rancho Mirage.

But the momentum in legislative and court decisions now seems to be going the other way, with Anaheim's appeal supported by a number of other cities and Los Angeles and Orange counties banning dispensaries in unincorporated areas.

Public opposition to medical marijuana has been minimal in Rancho Mirage, but appears to be growing in other parts of California, Mayor Richard Kite said.

“There seems to be more of a concern about the lawful dispensaries currently serving those cities and some of the activities surrounding them,” he said.

Another factor in the lack of public opposition is the absence of public testimony at the last two council meetings.

Kite said there will be a public hearing on Dec. 14. Quintanilla said residents also can speak Thursday, but judges reviewing new laws only look at the minutes from meetings where votes were taken.

Source: The Desert Sun

Tuesday, September 14, 2010

NEWS: New San Diego Rules Could Snuff Out Some Pot Dispensaries

The San Diego City Council directed the City Attorney's Office on Monday, to develop a zoning ordinance for the city's 125 medical marijuana dispensaries.

The ordinance is expected to be similar to one approved in June by the County's Board of Supervisors last June.

The new zoning regulations would require medical marijuana dispensaries to be at least 1000 feet away from schools, churches, parks, playgrounds, libraries, child care centers, youth facilities, and other dispensaries.

All dispensaries would be required to be a non-profit and apply for a conditional use permit. The dispensaries would only be allowed in industrial and commercial zones, without any residents living nearby.

This is only be the beginning of the process to create ordinances to regulate medical marijuana dispensaries. The Medical Marijuana Task Force, established in 2009, made several recommendations to the Land Use and Housing Committee, including requiring collectives to have security guards present during operating hours, more lighting outside dispensaries, limited operating hours, and rules regulating the types of signs dispensaries can use.

The city developed the Medical Marijuana Task Force to help city council create guidelines for medical marijuana patients, primary caregivers, marijuana cooperatives and collectives, and police enforcement.

Once the ordinance is written, it will go to the Planning Commission and return to the City Council for a final vote.

A statewide ballot measure to legalize Marijuana in California has been backed by a group of former law enforcement officials. The group includes former or retired police officers, judges and prosecutors.

They say keeping marijuana illegal props up drug cartels, and steers law enforcement away from more serious crimes.

Voters will have the final say on Proposition 19 in November. If passed, adults would be allowed to possess up to one ounce of marijuana.

Source: NBC San Diego

Share

Wednesday, September 8, 2010

NEWS: Wildomar City Council to vote tonight on medical marijuana ordinance

If adopted by the City Council, the ordinance would allow the creation of medical marijuana dispensaries in the city, something no other Riverside County city – outside of Palm Springs – has done.

Wildomar City Council is scheduled to vote tonight on whether to adopt a medical marijuana ordinance that, if passed, would set precedent in Southwest Riverside.

If adopted by the City Council, the ordinance would allow the creation of medical marijuana dispensaries in the city, something no other Riverside County city – outside of Palm Springs – has done.

The issue of medical marijuana has been on Wildomar’s radar for several months. In April, City Council passed a motion in a 4-1 vote to draft a medical marijuana ordinance. Mayor Bridgette Moore was the dissenting vote.

The Wildomar ordinance, which is modeled off one adopted by the Orange County retirement city of Laguna Woods, was drafted by the City Attorney’s office. It was then passed to the city’s planning commission to address zoning and land use considerations.

On Aug. 4, the planning commission voted 3-2 to recommend that City Council not adopt the ordinance.

Despite the commission’s recommendation, City Council may still vote to approve the ordinance.

Tonight’s City Council meeting is open to the public and begins at 7 p.m. at Wildomar City Hall.

Source: Southwest Riverside News Network

Share

Sunday, August 29, 2010

Harbor City Dispensaries, Collectives and Co-ops

Sunrise Caregiver Foundation
1151 W. Pacific Coast Hwy #4A
Harbor City, CA 90710
Phone: 310-530-1628 or 310-530-1645

Covers the following zip codes in Harbor City, California: 90710

TheCannabisChef.com - The Art and Science of Cooking with Cannabis (Medicinal Marijuana)

Sunday, July 18, 2010

NEWS: Wildomar commission to consider regulations to allow medical marijuana dispensaries

Wildomar could start on a path this week toward becoming the second Riverside County city to allow medical marijuana dispensaries.

The city's Planning Commission on Wednesday will consider a new law that would regulate the dispensaries, lifting a ban in place since Wildomar became a city in 2008.

First, the commission must decide if dispensaries are appropriate for the city. If so, it must decide how and where they can operate.

City Attorney Julie Hayward-Biggs drafted regulations based on a law passed by the city of Laguna Woods, an Orange County retirement community.

In a report prepared for the meeting, Planning Director David Hogan said commissioners could accept the ordinance as is, reject it or modify it as they see fit.

For example, the draft would give the city administration power to issue permits to dispensaries. The commission could decide to make the process more onerous, requiring public hearings before a business can open.

The draft would allow dispensaries in commercial zones only. But, Hogan said in the report, the commission could decide to relegate the businesses to industrial zones only, or it could allow them in both commercial and industrial zones.

Commissioners must also decide how far the dispensaries should be from schools, parks and other places children are likely to be. The draft law calls for them to be at least 1,000 feet away.

The draft does not put a cap on the number dispensaries allowed in the city. It allows them to be open only from 9 a.m. until 5 p.m. Monday through Friday. And it requires the businesses to have security cameras and to keep the tapes for at least two weeks in case police need them to investigate a crime.

All such regulations could be altered if the commission approves a new law.

The push to allow dispensaries began this spring, when a nonprofit marijuana collective, the Wildomar Patients Compassionate Group, opened a storefront location on Mission Trail. The collective's manager, William Sump, walked into City Hall and announced he would open the store, though city codes forbade it.

Wildomar's rules on medical marijuana were inherited from Riverside County when the city incorporated.

The collective's opening and subsequent quick closure sparked a response from local medical marijuana activists, who persuaded the council to consider allowing dispensaries.

In April, the council voted 4-1, with Mayor Bridgette Moore dissenting, to direct the city attorney to draft the new law. If the Planning Commission votes in favor of a new ordinance, the law would proceed to the City Council for approval.

Source: The Press-Enterprise

Share


Wednesday, July 14, 2010

A PATIENT STORY: I’m Broke. I Need My Keys.

On August 3, 2009, Colin Kent app-roached the front door of his home in the Lakefront Mobile Home Park in Lakeside that he shared with his middle-aged son to find an eviction notice. Kent, who was 88, had just returned home from a meeting with his son’s probation officer at which his son had been arrested on an outstanding felony warrant. Unable to drive and with his primary caregiver in custody, Kent had called a friend for a ride home.

The eviction notice was taped to the aluminum siding. Kent tried to insert his key into the lock, but it wouldn’t fit. The lock was broken and the door was stuck. After several attempts, he pried the door open. He stepped inside and found his home in disarray: furniture on its side, papers scattered across the floor, his son’s guitars thrown on the ground, boxes of belongings upended, the contents spilling out on the floor.

“The house was in shambles. The beds were all torn apart. The drawers were all pulled out. Everything was strewn all over,” said Kent during a June 10 interview at his new mobile home on Los Coches Road East, north of El Cajon. Kent sat at a small dining room table near the kitchen. On the walls of the mobile home were wooden carvings of birds. Two medals Kent received while serving in the Canadian Army during World War II hung on the living room wall.

“I thought we’d been burglarized, you see,” recalled Kent. “They tore the bloody place apart.” His voice quivered and his hands trembled as he described the scene. Kent, a former employee of Host International at Lindbergh Field, was tall despite a slouch in his back. His full head of white hair was combed straight back. He wore cutoff shorts and a white pinstriped button-down shirt. His rolled-up sleeves revealed black and blue freckles and scars on both arms. The octogenarian said he was prone to diabetic seizures. He was quick to let you know his age and his ailments but did so in a joking manner.

His son Christopher stood in the kitchen wearing shorts and a tank top. His straight, gray hair hung to his shoulders. He fidgeted while his father described that day last August.

Once inside his home, Kent stepped over the objects on the floor and went straight to his bedroom to check his safe, where he kept his most valuable possessions: the pieces of jewelry that he and his wife, who passed away in 2006, had purchased for each other during their 65-year marriage; rare coins that he collected; and what he called Hummels, decorative porcelain figurines his wife had purchased during their trips to Europe. Kent kept the keys to the safe’s many compartments in a copper tray on top of his desk. The keys were missing. He searched his home but couldn’t find them.

“I was panicky. You know, I’m old,” said Kent. “I didn’t know who the hell to call.”

He called the sheriff’s department to report the break-in. The dispatcher looked up his address and informed him that his house was not burglarized but was searched by federal agents.

The search came 13 months after Christopher, frustrated that a judge had denied his disability claim, had placed a call to the federal Office of Disability Adjudication and Review and left a message threatening the judge. According to an investigation report from the district attorney’s office, Christopher’s message was as follows: “Tell him I’m going to f*ing kill him. He will die if he doesn’t get out of town soon, and I mean soon.”

Christopher was charged under California penal code section 422, criminal threat. While he was being arrested, an investigator from the district attorney’s office and three federal agents from the Federal Protective Service — an agency under the Department of Homeland Security tasked with protecting federal buildings and the people inside them — entered Kent’s mobile home. Once inside, agents seized property from the residence. Later that day, four items were logged into court inventory. Those four items included one Sears Roebuck .22 LR rifle, a Ruger .22 LR pistol with a magazine clip with six rounds of ammo, one “green tinted pill bottle with a green, leafy substance inside,” and one medical marijuana identification card issued to Christopher Kent.

According to a “Municipal Court of California” inventory document, no keys were confiscated.

Colin Kent believed that the document was inaccurate. And he said the rifle and pistol belonged to him, not his son. But because of Christopher’s prior conviction, he was prohibited from having access to guns.

“They haven’t been fired in 30 or 40 years,” said Colin Kent. “I bought the rifle from Sears for $18, and one of my sons gave me the Ruger as a gift 35 years ago. But I don’t really care about the guns, anyways. I want my keys. I need money. I need to get in my safe so I can buy my medicine. I’m diabetic. I have seizures. I don’t even know what’s in the safe anymore. I have no idea what they took. I don’t know where my property is.”

One week after federal agents searched his home, Kent called the district attorney’s office to ask about his keys. “The district attorney told me to get a locksmith. I am broke, you see. I live off of Social Security, and it’s not enough. Plus, a locksmith won’t make those types of keys.”

In the following months, Kent wrote letters to California attorney general Jerry Brown. He called the Department of Homeland Security but didn’t receive a response. He wrote to Janet Napolitano, secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, yet again his queries were unanswered. Kent and his son went to the FBI field office on Aero Drive.

“They wouldn’t let me in the building,” said Kent. “They sent a lady out to talk to us. She said she’d look into it and call me. They never did. They wanted nothing to do with me. I’m broke. I need my keys.”

On June 15, Kent received a letter from the state attorney general’s office. “We regret that we are unable to assist you,” said the letter, suggesting that Kent write to senators Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer.

In a June 16 email, Matt Chandler, spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security, responded to questions about the case. “In August 2009, Department of Homeland Security Federal Protective Service officials served a criminal warrant to an individual wanted for threatening a judge,” wrote Chandler. “Several items were confiscated, including firearms the individual was not allowed to possess due to a prior felony conviction. All confiscated items were cataloged according to protocol and an inventory was filed with the court. Federal Protective Service has no record of the aforementioned keys being confiscated.”

When asked if Kent would be allowed to retrieve his property or look for his keys in inventory, Chandler responded: “We do not have any further comment. If you need further information, I would suggest contacting the San Diego District Attorney’s Office.”

In a series of emails, Paul Levikow, spokesperson for the San Diego County district attorney’s office, directed all questions back to the Department of Homeland Security. “We were not the impounding agency, rather our District Attorney Investigator assisted the federal officers tasked with protection of administrative courts,” he wrote.

Asked if the district attorney’s office has a record of Kent’s requests for his property. Levikow responded, “No.”

When asked where the confiscated items were taken, Levikow responded, “DHS.”

On June 16, sitting at his small dining room table, Kent appeared frail. He held the letter from Attorney General Brown’s office and copies of the letters he wrote to the Department of Homeland Security. He was discouraged and convinced that he would never get answers from public officials. He said he had run out of options.

“I don’t think I’ll ever be getting my keys back,” said Kent. “It pisses me off. I am entitled to my property. It’s the law, but I can’t enforce it.”

Colin Kent died on June 29 after suffering a diabetic seizure.

Source: San Diego Reader