If you know of an event that you feel should be listed on our calendar, please send details to info@mjdispensaries.com ~Thank You

Latest Headlines and Information

Showing posts with label medical cannabis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label medical cannabis. Show all posts

Monday, March 5, 2012

NEWS: FRENCH VALLEY - Commercial park was hub for marijuana

According to growers, 18 separate pot growing operations were crammed into 3 small, nondescript buildings. Arrests were made though no charges have been filed

Over the past year, an out-of-the-way commercial park on the outskirts of Murrieta became a hub of do-it-yourself medical marijuana growers.

According to the growers, 18 separate operations were crammed into suites in three small, nondescript buildings in French Valley. They grew plants under bright lights and sold the marijuana elsewhere to small numbers of patients. They worked quietly for at least a year, until federal drug agents and sheriff’s deputies shutting down a well-known dispensary stumbled onto their secret gardens.

Three growers were arrested but no charges have been filed. Riverside County district attorney’s spokesman John Hall said his office is not reviewing the case for possible charges. The U.S. attorney’s office said no federal arrests are expected.

The growers said they thought their operations were legal. California law allows members of collectives to buy and sell medical marijuana from each other as long as they are not-for-profit. The growers said they ran such nonprofit collectives.

The incident shows how difficult it still can be to navigate the conflicting state and federal laws governing medical marijuana more than 15 years after California voters made it legal. Marijuana is still considered an illegal narcotic under federal law.

Craig Cawley, 53, of Winchester, was among three people arrested during the raids. He has not been charged with a crime.

Cawley said he talked to officials from the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department and district attorney’s office, whose names he did not know, who told him his setup was OK. He kept his harvest small — many growers believe they won’t be busted for fewer than 100 plants — and felt everything was legal.

“I believed that to the moment I was handcuffed,” Cawley said.

FOR RENT

The tenants said the property was empty until their Orange County-based landlord hit on a new strategy: market it to marijuana growers.

An ad for the property on Craigslist didn’t mention marijuana but encouraged prospective tenants to “GROW GROW GROW”, according to marijuana growers who responded to it.

The ad no longer appears on the website.

Jonathan Cringan, 26, who also was arrested, said the landlord, David Cox, faced two options.

“Either lose the property or … rent it to weed growers,” Cringan said. “‘Cause that’s the only business in California where anybody’s making any money.”

Cox, reached by phone, declined to comment. It is unknown if he will face criminal charges.

For at least a year, the growers said, tenants paid twice the going rate, in cash, for the opportunity to harvest marijuana in the secluded park.

Cawley said he paid $3,000 a month for two adjoining suites. Offices in neighboring buildings rented for about $.60 per square foot, while space in Cox’s buildings cost $1.20, Cawley said.

The deal was worth it because landlords willing to accept small-scale marijuana farms in their buildings were rare, the growers said. And after the U.S. Attorney’s Office last year announced it was going after building owners who rented to dispensaries, even fewer were willing to allow any kind of marijuana activity, they said.

Cox had no shortage of prospective tenants, Cawley said.

“There was a line of people right behind me.”

WELL-KNOWN GROWERS

The property is on Innovation Court, just north of Murrieta off Winchester Road, among a sea of similar-looking rectangular structures. In nearby buildings, tenants include construction and air conditioning contractors, party rental and cleaning businesses.

Craig King, owner of Kitchen Places, said it was well known the buildings next door housed a collection of small marijuana farms.

“When the wind was blowing in the right direction, you could smell it,” he said.

The marijuana operations were housed in three adjacent buildings but run independently, Cringan said. He said the growers mainly kept to themselves, and while he felt he was operating legally, he worried the other operators would one day bring legal problems to his doorstep.

“Nobody’s involved in this industry without knowing that possibility exists,” he said.

DISPENSARIES TARGETED

In October, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Sacramento announced a statewide crackdown on medical marijuana dispensaries. Storefronts that sold marijuana had to shut down, the office said, or their operators and their landlords would face penalties.

Most of the operations at the French Valley commercial park were run by small-scale growers who kept a few dozen plants and sold the marijuana off-site to members of small collectives. But the property did house two storefront dispensaries, which sold to thousands of patients on-site.

One of the dispensaries closed soon after the warning, the growers said. The other, Disabled American Veterans Collective, did not.

So in January, Drug Enforcement Authority agents and Riverside County sheriff’s deputies served a search warrant and shut down Disabled American Veterans Collective, which has no relation to the nonprofit veterans services organization.

The dispensary’s owners, Kevin O. Freeman, 38, and Shelly Lee Walker, 28, of Murrieta, were arrested. They have not been charged with any crimes.

While searching the dispensary, officers heard the telltale sounds of large industrial fans and drug-sniffing dogs detected marijuana in adjoining suites, according to a federal search warrant. The discoveries led them to the enclave of growers.

Cringan and Cawley said they would have left the park if authorities had warned them, as they had the dispensary owners.

“I’m not trying to stick a middle finger up to the Justice Department,” Cringan said. “I’ve got respect.”

Cringan, Cawley and Scott Aaron Fielder were arrested on suspicion of cultivation and possession, sale and transportation of marijuana. They were each held for 72 hours and then released without charges being filed.

DEA agents took part in the raids but Department of Justice spokesman Thom Mrozek said no federal arrests were coming.

While some growers talk about improving access to sick people and standing up for patients’ rights, Cringan just wanted a job, he said. At the end of the day, that’s why people shell out thousands for rent and utility bills and risk prison, he said.

“The reality is, nobody would do this if we weren’t making money,” Cringan said. “Nobody’s going to risk going to federal prison unless there was some money in it.”

After graduating from Chaparral High School in Temecula and San Diego State University, Cringan said he was kicked out of George Washington University Law School in Washington, D.C., after an argument with a professor over a failing grade on a paper about medical marijuana laws.

Cawley said he was trying to raise money to start a charity that would send kids to summer camp.

Both men spent three days in jail, spent thousands of dollars on rent, electricity and the supplies that went into confiscated plants, and could wait up to three years before learning if they will be charged with any crimes.

“I’m at a crossroads in my life,” said Cringan, who is now living at home with his father in Menifee. “There aren’t many good choices available.”

Source: The Press-Enterprise

NEWS: Medical Marijuana Lawsuit Dismissed By Federal Judge In Sacramento

SAN FRANCISCO -- Medical marijuana advocates faced another setback Tuesday, when a federal judge in Sacramento dismissed a lawsuit claiming that the Obama administration broke its promise to leave the pot industry alone when it began an aggressive crackdown against California dispensaries last fall.

Proponents of the suit cited President Obama's 2009 Ogden Memo, which told federal prosecutors to concentrate their efforts on large drug trafficking networks and "not focus federal resources" on medical marijuana operations in states that have legalized cannabis for medicinal purposes.

But in a sharp reversal of the memo, federal authorities announced a renewed effort to target pot dispensaries throughout California last October, claiming the industry had ballooned to unprecedented proportions.

In the four months since the reinstated crackdown, a number of medical cannabis clubs across the state have been forced to shut down, including five in San Francisco and the legendary Marin Alliance for Medical Marijuana in Marin County, California's oldest. The District Attorney's office has begun investigating 12 more stores in San Francisco this year.

The U.S. attorneys going after such dispensaries have justified their actions mainly by claiming the shops operate too close to parks and schools.

Pot activists have fought back, arguing the federal government should focus its energy elsewhere and not interfere with states abiding by their own laws.

"It's a total waste of resources," Stephanie Tucker, spokeswoman for the San Francisco Medical Cannabis Task Force, told The Huffington Post. "They're attacking a peaceful, regulated community and it's wasting money. Shame on them."

The Sacramento lawsuit was one of a handful filed in November by cannabis suppliers and patients, who cited the Ogden Memo as the basis for their action. U.S. District Judge Garland Burrell, who reviewed the case in the capitol, justified his dismissal by claiming the memo was not a "binding commitment," simply a statement of priorities.

Burrell's ruling will allow for prosecutors to continue to take action against dispensaries operating throughout the state.

Matthew Kumin, a lawyer representing one of the dispensaries in the Sacramento case, told SF Weekly that the dismissal of the cases without allowing a fair trial is bogus. "The government's blocking of us is irrational at this point," Kumin said to SF Weekly. "It's clear there's medical use; circumstances have changed."

Kumin pointed to federally-backed clinical trials of cannabis-based drugs such as Sativex as proof that scientists believe marijuana has a medical benefit. Despite that, he said he expects similar lawsuits in Oakland and Los Angeles to be dismissed this week.

"The judges know we're in the right," he said. "They just don't want to admit it."

Source: The Huffington Post

Wednesday, January 11, 2012

NEWS: Long Beach judge recuses himself from medical marijuana case before sentencing

LONG BEACH -- A local judge recused himself from a medical marijuana case at the 11th hour Wednesday, admitting he made a serious error when he sent a complimentary letter to the prosecutor prior to sentencing.

Long Beach Superior Court Judge Charles Sheldon voluntarily removed himself from the case of Joe Grumbine and Joe Byron, the owners and operators of a trio of medical marijuana collectives who were convicted of illegal drug sales last month.

In a stunning revelation that drew exclamations from many in the courtroom, Sheldon admitted he sent a "complimentary letter" to Deputy District Attorney Jodi Castano before the matter was finished.


"I don't know what I was thinking," Sheldon said, adding that he meant what he said in the missive, which was dated Jan. 5, but it was inappropriate to send while the case was still active.

His recusal drew raucous applause, cheers and shouts from a courtroom brimming with about 50 medical marijuana advocates who have rallied inside and outside the Long Beach courthouse throughout Grumbine and Byron's trial.

Defense Attorney Christopher Glew said outside court that the letter congratulated the prosecutor on a job well done and showed the judge's clear bias in case.

"I've never seen anything like it," Glew said. "But it was obvious from the start that Judge Sheldon was biased ... he said from the very beginning there are no legal sales of marijuana of any kind."

Grumbine and Byron were convicted Dec. 21 -- on 13 felony counts including illegal sales of narcotics, grand theft, and filing false tax returns -- following a roughly three week trial.

Supporters of the defendants insist the charges are nothing more than an attack by zealous police and prosecutors in violation of the state's medical marijuana law and have accused authorities of fabricating evidence.

Castano insisted in her opening statements to the jury the case was about two men using the sick and infirm as a shield for illegal drug deals.

"This case is not about whether people have the right to medical marijuana," Castano told the jury at the start of the trial last month. "This case is about two wolves in sheeps' clothing. It's about two men who were out to line their pockets ... with millions of dollars."

Grumbine and Byron were arrested in December of 2009 after police raided the three locations, two in Long Beach and one in Garden Grove.

The legal wrangling began long before the trial, with numerous motions heard as both sides sought to block some witnesses and evidence.

The district attorney and defendants' attorneys disagreed from the start over whether a medical marijuana defense could be presented. Initially, Sheldon ruled no such a defense would be allowed, said supporter Cheri Sicard.

Glew and co-defense Attorney Allison Margolin challenged Sheldon's ruling in a higher court and was awarded a judgement that required the lower court to allow the medical marijuana defense, Sicard said.

Nonetheless, police and prosecutors insisted the defendants used the collectives as profit-driven drug dealing operations run like stores with frequent flier cards, specials and discounts offered inside the businesses.

The defendants, Castano said, tried to hide the businesses by using fictitious business names. She also said the accused stole electricity from neighboring businesses to hide the large amount of power needed to grow the plants.

Bills were paid by money order to eliminate paper trials, the prosecutor noted. The defendants, she said, under-reported their sales tax for two years, pocketing more than $2 million.

Though Sheldon has recused himself from the case, the convictions still stand. However Glew and Margolin said they are preparing motions for a new trial, which will be heard in a new court, by Judge Joan Comparet-Cassani, on April 3.

The motions will include arguments that Sheldon's bias denied their clients a chance at a fair trial and will also cite juror misconduct, Glew said, referring to one jurors revelation post conviction that the group used the Internet to look up the definition of marijuana collectives even though they were instructed by the court that they could not use any outside source of information while deliberating the case.

Even the appointment of the new judge looked as though it was going to be a tough fight Wednesday morning, as Glew and Margolin told Long Beach Superior Court Supervising Judge James Otto they opposed the case being transferred to Comparet-Cassani.

Moments later, however, they withdrew their challenge of the venue.

Outside the courtroom, Glew explained that though he is concerned about Comparet-Cassani's strict ruling record the only other options left at the Long Beach Court would prove even more unfavorable to the defense's case.

"We don't have a lot of options for a fair trial in Long Beach," Glew said.

Source: Press-Telegram

VIDEO: Long Beach City Council Postpones Medical Marijuana Dispensary Ban



The Human Solution - the-human-solution.org

Monday, August 22, 2011

Sun Valley Dispensaries, Collectives and Cooperatives

Blue Sky Caregivers
8233 San Fernando Rd. [map]
Sun Valley, CA 91352
Hours: Mon-Sun 8am to 3am
Phone: 818-640-2196

Valley Holistic Caregivers
7200 Vineland Ave. Suite 205 [map]
Sun Valley, CA 91352
Hours: Mon-Sun 11am to 8pm
Phone: 818-255-5511
Web: kingsofkush.com

VetMed Caregivers
9364 S. San Fernando Rd. [map]
Sun Valley, CA 91352
Hours: Mon-Sun 10am to 8pm
Phone: 818-287-7049

Sunday, May 8, 2011

Long Beach Medical Marijuana Dispensaries, Collectives and Co-ops

1 Love Beach Club
2767 E Broadway [map]
Long Beach, CA 90803
Hours: Mon-Sat 11am to 8pm, Sun 12am to 5pm
Phone: 562-343-5388
E-Mail: info@1love420.com
Web: http://www.1love420.com

562 Discount Meds
2025 E 10th St. [map]
Long Beach, CA 90804
Phone: 562-343-7007
Web: lbmmd.com

Alternative Therapeutic Solutions
5707 Atlantic Ave [map]
Long Beach, CA 90805
Phone: 562-428-7033
Fax: 562-372-3315
Hours: Mon-Sun 10am to 7pm
Web: facebook.com/ATS.MEDS
Twitter: twitter.com/ATSMEDS

Avalon Wellness Collective
1302 Gaylord [map]
Long Beach, CA 90813
Phone: 562-628-8881
Web: Weed Maps

Belmont Shore Natural Care
5375 E 2nd St., Long Beach, CA 90803
Phone: 562-987-0210
Hours: Mon-Sun 9:00am to 7pm
Website: belmontshorenaturalcare.com

C.A.R.E. Collective
3009 E. South Street [map]
Long Beach, CA 90805
Phone: 562-633-5874

Chronic Pain Releaf Center
1501 Santa Fe Ave. [map]
Long Beach, CA 90813
Hours: Mon-Sun 9am to 7pm
Phone: 562-432-5555
Website: http://www.myreleaf.com

Cornerstone Health & Wellness

1838 E. Wardlow St.
Long Beach, CA 90807
Phone: 562-426-9800
Hours: Mon-Sat 10am to 8pm, Sun 10am to 5pm
Website: cornerstonemeds.com/

Dank Depot
5595 E. 7th Street
Long Beach, CA 90804
Phone: 562-597-6041
Hours: Mon-Sun 10am to 8pm
Website: http://www.DankDepot.com
E-Mail: dank_depot@yahoo.com

Green Earth Center
3748 Atlantic Ave., Long Beach, CA 90807 [map]
Hours: Mon-Sat 11am-8pm, Sun 11am-6pm
Phone: 562-989-0300
Email: info@greenearthcenter.com
Web: greenearthcenter.blogspot.com



Greenhouse Caregivers
1428 W. Willow St. Long Beach, CA 90810 [map]
Hours: Mon-Sun 10am to 8pm
Phone: 562-290-8180
Email: ghcaregivers@verizon.net

Herbal Solutions:
  1. 1206 E. Wardlow Rd. Long Beach, CA - 562-997-2929 - Hours: Daily 10am-8pm
  2. 5746 E. 2nd St. Long Beach, CA - 562-434-5075 - Hours: Daily 10am-8p

High Quiggle Healing Center
1532 E. Broadway [map and more]
Long Beach, CA 90802
Phone: 562-951-3975
Hours: Mon-Sat 10am to 8:00pm, Sun 1:00pm to 8:00pm
Email: 420firestarter@gmail.com

Industry Green Collective
2200 N. Lakewood Blvd. [map]
Long Beach, CA 90815
Phone: 562-986-9400
Hours: Mon-Sat 10am-8pm, Sun 11am-6pm

Irie Collective
1424 E. Broadway Ave. [map]
Long Beach, CA 90802
Hours: Mon-Sun 10am to 7pm
Phone: 562-432-2111

Long Beach Collective
1731 E. Artesia Blvd. [map]
Long Beach, CA 90805
Hours: Mon-Sat 9am to 7pm, Sun 10am to 7pm
Phone: 562-934-2520

Long Beach Green Room
1735 E. 7th St. [map]
Long Beach, CA 90813
Hours: Mon-Sun 9am to 7pm
Phone: 562-591-0001

Natural Solutions
2130 W. Cowles St. [map]
Long Beach, CA 90813
Phone: 562-425-8310

NatureCann
4340 Atlantic Ave.
Long Beach, CA 90807
Hours: Mon-Sat 11am to 8pm, Sun 12pm to 5pm
Phone: 323-515-4500
Website: www.naturecann.com
Email: info@naturecann.com

Covers the following zip codes in Long Beach, California: 90745, 90746, 90747, 90749, 90755, 90801, 90802, 90803, 90804, 90805, 90806, 90807, 90808, 90809, 90810, 90813, 90814, 90815, 90822, 90831, 90832, 90833, 90834, 90835, 90840, 90842, 90844, 90845, 90846, 90847, 90848, 90853, 90888, 90895, 90899

The Human Solution - the-human-solution.org

Monday, February 21, 2011

NEWS: Joe Grumbine Talks About a Natural Stress Reliever Through Cannabis

Joe Grumbine, founder of The Human Solution, lives with his family at Willow Creek Springs where he has a rather large garden of healing herbs, including cannabis.

Joe has been helping others heal with plant-based medicines far longer than the general public has understood the healing benefits of one of his most popular plants: cannabis.

A natural stress reliever, cannabis was used in his tinctures years ago when he first discovered an ancient recipe and saw how the liquid was a unique delivery method for those who needed the plant but didn’t know any other way to get it other than by smoking it.

Source: MedicalMarijuana411.com

Sunday, February 6, 2011

Northridge Dispensaries, Collectives and Co-ops

Cannamed of Northridge
9345 Melvin Ave. Unit 1 [map]
Northridge, CA 91324
Hours: Mon-Sat 11:00am to 8:00pm (Sun CLOSED)
Phone: 818-882-4849

Neighborhood Canna Store (NCS)
8323 Reseda #102
Northridge, CA 91324
Phone: 818-576-0420

The Alternative Medicine Journal. TreatingYourself.com

Tuesday, January 25, 2011

NEWS: Conference markets medical marijuana to seniors

Laguna Woods – Wearing a powder-blue cardigan and orthopedic shoes, 86-year-old Dorothy Davidson learned how to make a marijuana smoothie as well as the difference between consuming baked weed and the raw plant at a Saturday conference aiming to teach seniors about medical cannabis.

"You hear so many negative things about it," said Davidson. "Now I know how it works."

The Brea woman has suffered from back pain for years after falling down a flight of stairs. Two metal rods in her back support her spine, and Vicodin no longer works well as a pain killer. Her son suggested she try medical marijuana, and with the approval of her doctor, she used it for the first time in December and noticed a difference in her pain level.

Still wary, she attended the Medical Cannabis Conference in Laguna Woods, the first of its kind in Orange County.

Conference organizers point to the aging baby boomer generation as possible beneficiaries of medical marijuana, and their goal was to encourage seniors to incorporate it into their health care routines.

Opponents of medical marijuana downplay its medicinal effects and say those with pain have the option to use several legal drugs.

Despite a 1996 California law legalizing the use of pot for medicinal purposes, several cities have tried to keep out medical marijuana dispensaries. The County of Orange adopted a ban for unincorporated areas, as did cities such as San Clemente and Huntington Beach. Officials have said banning dispensaries is better for public safety and welfare.

Other cities do not have laws that allow or disallow the sale of medical marijuana, creating a gray area that sometimes leads to the courtroom. Dana Point is suing several dispensaries for a peek at their financial records to ensure they are operating legally.

Laguna Woods allows dispensaries, but does not have one. However, some groups run nonprofit collectives in the retirement community located in town.

At the conference, speakers from doctors to lab researchers talked about the benefits of cannabis. They also described attempts at quality control and self-regulation, such as proper labeling. Some said ingesting the raw plant delivers medicinal properties without psychoactive effects.

Several of the about 100 attendees said they voted against Proposition 19, a 2010 ballot initiative to legalize recreational marijuana. They were using the plant to feel better, not to get high [and why do people get high? To feel better of course!]. Opponents have said medical marijuana is a pathway to recreational use.

Letitia Pepper poses questions for the panel.
Letitia Pepper, a 56-year-old suffering from multiple sclerosis, a disease involving the central nervous system, said she concentrates marijuana extract with vegetable glycerin to make a liquid. When in pain, she squeezes a few drops under her tongue.

"People come up to me and say 'Oh, you look great,' " said Pepper of Riverside, wearing a T-shirt that said "Pills Kill." She said friends are surprised when she credits medical marijuana for the change.

Shari Horne, a member of the Village Cannabis Club in Laguna Woods, said the only way to change that is to create a new image for marijuana users.

"We can do it by being the kind of people they're not expecting. Get rid of that 'Cheech and Chong' attitude," she said, referring to stand-up comedians famous for drug-focused routines.

"People our age — there's no reason we shouldn't be able to feel better," she said.

Source: OC Register

Tuesday, January 18, 2011

Make marijuana ordinance clear: Letters for Tuesday, Jan. 18

Re "City Council to tweak medical marijuana ordinance" (Jan. 15):

The City Council needs to provide the public with clear and specific guidelines for the operation of medical marijuana dispensaries. Woodland Hills, at one time, had 40 dispensaries. While many have been closed, some may reopen under the city's new rules. Woodland Hills is attractive to dispensaries because of its relaxed suburban character and because it's adjacent to unincorporated L.A. County, which does not permit medicinal marijuana sales.

When many of the now-closed stores opened, all they needed was a resale license. I ask the City Council to come up with rules, like those used to permit the sale of alcohol and the revocation of sales permits, for marijuana dispensaries. Without these tools we will be unable to moderate or prohibit the actions of the stores and their customers anywhere in L.A. We need these rules now.

- SEAN MCCARTHY

Encino

Libraries vital in crime prevention

Re "Safety First" (Editorial, Jan. 9):

Police officers, public safety experts and district attorneys understand that a high literacy rate and the availability of after-school activities are among the most important factors in creating a safe city.

While the Daily News is right to place a high priority on funding for our vital police and fire services, this simply is not and cannot be the only solution. City of Los Angeles

libraries operate the largest after-school program in the city and are responsible for providing literacy programs for toddlers, children, teens and adults. Libraries are crime preventers. When neighborhood libraries close or reduce their hours significantly, there are few alternatives for the 90,000 children who visit our 73 branches weekly.
In the 2010-2011 budget cycle, the Police and Fire departments received nearly 70 percent of the city's budget. The Library Department on the other hand received approximately 3 percent! I authored and continue to support Measure L because as someone with 38 years on the Police Department, including five years as chief, I know it will reverse the current trend of cuts that have devastated our libraries and compromised our public safety, prevention and intervention efforts. In these tough economic and budget times we must not be penny-wise and pound-foolish.

- BERNARD C. PARKS

Los Angeles

The writer represents the L.A. City Council's

Eighth District and is a former LAPD police chief

Human nature holds U.S. back

America the beautiful, minus human nature, would be near perfection.

- LLORENS PEMBROOK

Studio City

AT&T phone outages to be fixed

AT&T is solid in its commitment to its customers in Los Angeles, and recovery efforts from the recent historically devastating storms are no exception. AT&T is continuing to do all it can to ensure every resident resumes service. I know AT&T is working with many VICA members to achieve this goal. Technicians were brought from Northern California to work around the clock until every phone outage is fixed. As Southern California residents, we are all too familiar with natural disasters and have witnessed AT&T's commitment to its customers under these circumstances.

- STUART WALDMAN

Van Nuys

The writer is president of the Valley Industry and Commerce Association (VICA)

Unlikely to meet energy goals

Re "DWP leaps ahead of clean energy goals"

(Jan. 14):

To begin to meet mandated renewable energy levels, the Department of Water and Power constructed the Pine Tree Wind Farm at a cost of more than $425 million, consisting of 80 wind towers on 2,000 acres. While rated at 120 megawatts, wind pattern studies, part of the Integrated Resources Plan, indicates that during the windy month of August 2009, the farm actually provided 13 to 48 megawatts on an average day minus conversion and line losses.

The installation will provide, on average, 0.42 percent of the electrical energy needed by the city of Los Angeles and will require hot backup from gas turbine plants when the wind does not blow. While DWP predicts a 5 percent increase per year in costs, I believe the prediction of Jack Humphreville - who serves on the neighborhood council panel working with the DWP - of increases of 8 percent and more. Reality sets in.

- GORDON OSBORNE

Woodland Hills

Source: Los Angeles Daily News

The Alternative Medicine Journal. TreatingYourself.com

NEWS: More Scrutiny for California's Medical Marijuana Dispensaries

California medical marijuana dispensaries are facing raids and tax audits from local and federal officials skeptical about their finances and their legitimacy, The New York Times reported Jan. 8.

Frank Carrubba, a Santa Clara County deputy district attorney, said, "We're trying to get to a point where we get we can weed out - for lack of a better word - to filter out the people that are really perverting this law just to sell drugs,"

Although a state initiative to legalize marijuana was unsuccessful at the polls in November, medical marijuana dispensaries continue to pull in cash. Officials in Oakland estimate that dispensaries there brought in between $35 million and $38 million last year.

San Jose, The New York Times wrote, "now boasts 98 dispensaries - four times the number of 7-Eleven convenience stories in the city."

Recent raids on the New Age Healing Collective in San Jose, and the home of its owners, turned up two sets of books. The store ledger showed the dispensary was $123,128 in the red. The ledger found in the owners' home showed a profit of $222,238 for the same time period. The owners denied wrongdoing.

The chief executive of Harborside Health Center, a large Oakland dispensary, said his business was being audited by the Internal Revenue Service. Though the I.R.S. did not confirm whether it was performing such an audit, company representatives said the I.R.S. was focused on a part of the tax code that says companies cannot deduct expenses when they are "trafficking in controlled substances."

Harborside said it was operating legally. It has appealed to Senator Barbara Boxer for help, stating in a letter to her that about 80 jobs are at stake.

The state law allowing medical dispensaries is unambiguous that collectives may grow marijuana for medical purposes, but hazy when it comes to selling it, said the author of the law, William Panzer. He argued that state lawmakers should act to create clearer guidelines.

"Let's come out from under the shadows and say, 'Here are the rules,'" he said. "The law around distribution is very hazy, and we need the Legislature to do something. We've fallen behind other states on regulations for medical marijuana sales."

In the absence of regulatory guidance, dispensaries operate both as large businesses and as nonprofit health centers.

"It's kind of difficult line to straddle for them, but a lot of them are doing it," said Betty Yee, who sits on the board that oversees state taxes.

Yee added that dispensaries don't necessarily have large profit margins. "The cost of their product is so huge that there is sometimes a perception that they're making a lot of money when in fact their margins are pretty thin," she said.

Representatives for marijuana dispensaries objected to the police raids. Paul Stewart, who directs the Medicinal Cannabis Collective Coalition, said, "They are acting on what could be considered a specious legal finding by the D.A.; their finding is that all collectives are operating illegally because they are making a profit."

Geoffrey Rawlings, lawyer for one of the owners of the New Age Healing Collective where the duplicate books were found, said, "When you're dealing with medical cannabis and you see these blond, dreadlocked corporate officers coming and going, it kind of agitates law enforcement and raises their hackles a little more than the pizza shop owner down the street."

He added, "They are convinced that these people are breaking the laws without any evidence in advance that they're breaking the law."

Source: JoinTogether.org

LEAP - Law Enforcement Against Prohibition - www.leap.cc

Saturday, January 15, 2011

EVENT: Medical Cannabis Conference - January 22nd 2011



http://www.cbdconference.com | The Orange County Chapter of NORML, Apothecary Genetics, GGECO University, Kush Media will be holding a one day Medical Cannabis Conference for Seniors, Medical Professionals and the Community. This conference will take place on Saturday, January 22, 2011 from 9 AM to 8 PM in Orange County, CA.

California voters passed Proposition 215 in 1996, which allowed qualified patients with a physician's recommendation to use medical marijuana legally. In 2003 Senate Bill 420 was passed and allowed patients who are not able to grow their own medicine to join patient collectives providing safe access to their medicine. In the last couple years there has been an increase in Medical Cannabis. In an effort to help further state, county, & city agencies educate and protect the public, about the proper safe use and governing legislation regarding Medical Cannabis. Educating the public about safe use with various routes of administration, dosage forms, and methods of usage are known and that correct information is being received by the public and medical community this conference is being held.

The Medical Cannabis Conference will be bringing two renowned Physicians to Orange County for their first presentations ever in this area, Dr. William Courtney and Dr. Donald Abrams.

William Courtney, M.D., has an extensive medical education; he received his Bachelor of Science from the University of Michigan, his Doctor of Medicine from Wayne State University, and his Post Doctorate in Forensic Examination and Forensic Medicine. Dr. Courtney currently has a private practice in Mendocino County, California. Dr. Courtney is currently a member of International Cannabinoid Research Society, the International Association of Cannabis as Medicine, the Society of Clinical Cannabis and Vice President of the Association Luxembourgeoise des Methodes Preventives.

Donald Abrams, M.D., is Professor of Clinical Medicine at the University of California San Francisco and Chief of Hematology/Oncology at San Francisco General Hospital. He provides Integrative Oncology consultations at the UCSF Osher Center for Integrative Medicine. He is a member of the UCSF Comprehensive Cancer Center Executive Committee and is co-chairing the Center's developing program in Symptom Management, Palliative Care and Survivorship.

Also scheduled to speak is William Britt Founder of the Association of Patient Advocates and Court Qualified Cannabis Expert, Debby Goldsberry one of the Founders of Americans for Safe Access, Lanny Swerdlow, R.N. and Director of Marijuana Anti Prohibition Project, Jeffrey C. Raber, Ph.D. of The Werc Shop, Sytze Elzinga Cannabis Research, Bret Bogue from GGECO University, Brett Stack of Marijuana Saves Lives, Cheryl Shuman from Kush Magazine, Lonnie Painter from Laguna Woods Medical Cannabis Collective, Anna Boyce, R.N. a community activist, Marla James from OC Americans for Safe Access, and Attorney Jeremy Joseph from the Unconventional Foundation for Autism.

For the conclusion of the conference there will be a screening of "What If Cannabis Cured Cancer" and a question and answer session with the documentary's Director Len Richmond.

The Orange County chapter of NORML is a nonprofit organization working since 2003 to spread knowledge about alternatives to the drug war and working to protect the rights of California medical marijuana patients. Apothecary Genetics is a multi-faceted corporation which includes GGECO University that strives to bring the most up to date information to educate people on the properties of cannabis and its medical uses, as well as the properties of hemp and our need to have these plants legalized in the United States. Kush Magazine and Daily Buds are the #1 media source and social network site for the cannabis industry.

Friday, January 14, 2011

Buying medical marijuana: behind the green curtain

by Randy Kalp

Editor’s Note: Proposition 215, also called the Compassionate Use Act, was passed in 1996. Since then, there seems to be a lot of confusion from people on all sides of the issue about exactly what is and isn’t legal concerning medical marijuana.

This is the first in a two-part series on medical marijuana in San Diego County and attempts to clear up some of the misconceptions regarding buying medical marijuana. The second part of the series, which will run next week, will focus on medical marijuana dispensaries and feature some prominent local legal battles addressing the issue.


Luke is 10 pounds heavier than he was several months ago, and he couldn’t be happier.

For the last decade, Luke, who asked that his real name not be published, has suffered from a debilitating genetic back disorder. In order to relieve the pain, he takes a daily dose of pain relievers, including the powerful narcotic Oxycontin. While the pharmaceutical medication helps with his pain, it also causes him severe nausea.

“I lost a lot of weight and wasn’t feeling good,” the 66-year-old Encinitas resident said.

In June 2010, Luke decided to explore medical marijuana to help with his nausea and weight loss. But despite Proposition 215 being passed 14 years ago, he still had anxiety about getting his recommendation due to an uncertainty about the legality of possessing medicinal marijuana as well as the legitimacy of seeing a physician who advertises in the back of a free weekly magazine.

Under Proposition 215 and Senate Bill 420, which was enacted in 2003 as a compromise between advocates and law enforcement, state guidelines were established relating to how much marijuana a qualified patient could legally grow and possess.

According to the guidelines established by Attorney General Edmund G. Brown Jr. in 2008, patients and primary caregivers may possess 8 ounces of dried marijuana, and cultivate six mature or 12 immature plants per patient, if they hold a state-issued identification card. But if needed, a patient or primary caregiver can receive an additional doctor’s recommendation stating that the aforementioned quantity does not meet their medical needs, and that the patient or primary caregiver may possess a larger amount of marijuana.

The confusion

Since the county began issuing the state of California Medical Marijuana Identification Card, or MMIC, in July 2009, the Department of Health and Human Services has issued 790 cards; however, that number is not indicative of the actual number of patients recommended under Proposition 215/SB 420 in the county. The number is actually much higher because the state card is not mandatory to legally possess marijuana in San Diego, and California for that matter. A patient only needs a recommendation from a physician, which must be renewed yearly.

“The doctor issued cards are not connected with the state MMIC programs,” said Adrienne Yancey, an assistant deputy director with the county’s Health and Human Services Agency. “The state MMIC has a unique identifier for each valid card holder that is listed in the state MMIC registry.”

While the program is voluntary, those are the only identification cards that offer the patient protection from arrest, according to the attorney general’s guidelines. Alternately, if a physician’s identification card or recommendation is presented, the officer is supposed to review the document and then use his own judgment to determine whether the person is within the local or state possession guidelines.

Since adopting the program, Yancey said the county has received 819 applications; the majority — 573 — coming from persons aged 31 and up. The application fee for the state card is $166 or $83 for Medi-Cal beneficiaries, which is in addition to the doctor’s fee charged to obtain the recommendation. And just like the physician’s recommendation, the card needs to be renewed yearly.

Curt Moore, who operates Canna Care Consultants, a medical marijuana referral service in Oceanside, said first-time patients pay $89, while renewals cost $80. If the physician approves the patient for medical marijuana, they are then given a paper recommendation, which he advises patients to keep in their glove compartment, as well as a wallet-sized medical marijuana card. Additionally, Moore said his office also uses a third-party verification company that is available 24 hours a day for medical marijuana providers, such as collectives, or law enforcement to utilize so they can check the validity of the patient’s recommendation.

However, Moore said the state card is the only card that law enforcement agencies have to recognize on the spot. “Basically, the card that all doctors give out are fluff; they hold no legal value,” he said. “We shrink down the original recommendation to card size with the hope that law enforcement will see it and call the number.”

Despite the cost of the state card, Moore, who has operated his referral service on South Coast Highway for more than six months, recommended that patients who travel with their medication or cultivate their own marijuana under Proposition 215/SB Bill 420 get the state card.

Kris Hermes, a spokesman for Americans for Safe Access, also agreed that if a patient can afford the state card it is a good idea to apply for it. Often, Hermes said, patients shy away from the state card or medical marijuana as whole because they believe that their information is going to end up in the hands of local or federal law enforcement.

Though Yancey said when asked, state law requires the county’s records and information regarding medicinal marijuana patients to be kept confidential; however, if the records are subpoenaed then it’s handled on a case-by-case basis relating to the facts and circumstances of each particular case and subpoena.

Throughout the state, Hermes said his organization has seen better compliance from law enforcement agencies as key court cases are won regarding Proposition 215/SB Bill 420, including the 2009 ruling in which the California Supreme Court ruled that San Diego and San Bernardino County could not use federal law as an excuse to avoid implementing the state MMIC program. However, he said there are still instances where local authorities want to ignore state law even though the courts have “flatly” ruled that federal law does not pre-empt state law.

A quick trip to the doctor’s office

When Luke decided to get his evaluation for medicinal marijuana, his two friends, who also suffer from their own set of ailments — arthritis, a rotator cuff injury, back pain — decided they would also get evaluated.

One of Luke’s friends, Ken — a North County business owner who also asked to remain anonymous — said the trio drove to downtown San Diego for their doctor’s visit. Inside the waiting room, the three men — all in their 60s — were handed paperwork to fill out about their medical history, ailments and experience with marijuana.

Ken said the waiting room looked just like any other physician’s office. Besides his group, he said there were four other people, who appeared to range in age from 30 to 60, waiting to be seen by the doctor.

“We totally didn’t feel nervous because it was a friendly place,” Ken said. “It’s not dark or seedy or anything, but we were still a little apprehensive.”

Because the three men were together, their evaluation was performed at the same time. After taking their blood pressure, the physician then conducted her evaluation by talking to the men about their ailments and medical history; 20 minutes later the trio left the referral office each with a recommendation to legally use, possess and cultivate marijuana.

“It didn’t seem like a slimy atmosphere,” Luke said. “I felt pretty at ease.”

At Canna Care Consultants, Moore said his office gets a lot of cancer patients with nausea and joint pain. Recently, he said he had an 83-year-old patient who had never used marijuana before come in for a recommendation.

“Every year they keep proving the medicinal benefits are great,” Moore said. “Of course it’s not snake venom though; it’s not a miracle cure, but it does have a lot of benefits for a lot of patients.”

Unfortunately, for North County residents who would like to get an evaluation close to home, Canna Care Consultants is only one of three in the area; the other two are in Vista and Carlsbad.

“The North County has a real need for more services,” Moore said.

City officials in Oceanside, Vista and Carlsbad have said that medical marijuana referral offices are legal to open; it’s just dispensaries — collectives that operate nonprofit storefronts to sell medicinal marijuana products to patients — that are currently barred in those cities.

“We would treat that as a kind of like medical office,” Carlsbad City Attorney Paul Edmundson. “If there was a doctor who gave a referral for medical marijuana that would be under the ethical practices as opposed to a dispensary.”

Moore said doctors who are conducting evaluations just for the money are a large reason why referral services have gotten a bad name. “Without denials, it’s not a real doctor’s office, because not everybody coming through the door is legitimate,” he said.

Since opening in April, Moore said his office has rejected a lot of people, some of whom he said looked to be only 15 or 16 years old. One safeguard Moore and his doctor have established is to only issue one-month recommendations for patients who don’t have their medical records or prescription bottles with them during the evaluation to justify their medical condition; the patient would then be required to bring in their records after the month is up.

“It’s a little inconvenient for the patient, but it helps protect the office and the doctor,” Moore said.

In addition to physician evaluations, Moore said his office is focused on providing each patient with the information they need to fully benefit from the use of medicinal marijuana. For instance, he said his elderly patients — his oldest is 90 — often do not like to smoke it, so his office informs them about other ways marijuana can be ingested and still be effective. Further, Moore said his office also instructs patients on how to cultivate their own marijuana, which is highly beneficial for users on a fixed income.

“We try to be full-service and help them in anyway we can,” Moore said.

Source: Coast News Group

The Alternative Medicine Journal. TreatingYourself.com

Wednesday, December 22, 2010

NEWS: Pot Collectives Vow To Fight Further City Restrictions

The medical marijuana collectives facing elimination in Long Beach have vowed to keep fighting for their right to exist — in the face of a second reading to finalize the law this January.

During its Dec. 14 meeting, the City Council passed a first reading for the medical marijuana ordinance that will eliminate as many as a dozen more collectives. Many of those collective owners have come out publicly, or through an attorney, pleading with the council to allow for relocation.

Some collective owners said they are trying to remain optimistic they will get an opportunity to relocate.

The original ordinance was enacted in the late summer, eliminating many of an estimated 90-plus collectives through an application and lottery process. After the lottery, the number of potential collectives was reduced to 32.

Then in early November, Third District Councilman Gary DeLong, Fifth District Councilwoman Gerrie Schipske and Fourth District Councilman Patrick O’Donnell introduced an agenda item for further restrictions. The council decided to enact park buffers. It was believed then that an additional nine collectives would be eliminated with the newer restrictions added.

Vance Watson, president of One Source Discount Caregivers, 5115 Atlantic Ave., said he believes his operation has legal grounds to stop the city from shutting it down. His dispensary was a winner in the lottery earlier this year, but would be shut down by the new ordinance restrictions not allowing collectives near a park.

“They pulled the rug right out from under us,” he said.

Watson said he has been working with three different lawyers in regards to what types of action his dispensary can take, depending on whether the council passes a second reading with no changes from the Dec. 14 vote.

To some owners, the process has been discredited with the latest round of restrictions, which appear to single out certain collectives — including Herbal Solutions Naples, 5746 E. Second St.

In a statement released by ownership, Herbal Solutions accused the council of “trying to exercise their legislative powers in an unabashed attempt to change the outcome of the lottery.”

“This is not a minor issue and all citizens of the city should be concerned with the precedent that this amendment sets,” the statement says.

Watson said the City Council removing beaches from the definition of parks also has raised some eyebrows.

“Who benefits from them not including beaches?” he said. “Aren’t kids still at beaches? What kind of politicking is really going on behind the scenes?”

Ninth District Councilman Steven Neal initially brought up striking beaches from the definition during the council meeting. He said his intent has been to move forward with rules that follow the original ordinance as closely as possible.

“The city has been levied with several lawsuits to date, and any changes would add further lawsuits,” he said.

The removal of beaches from the parks definition is likely to spare one or two collectives, according to initial estimates.

DeLong said his intent with further restrictions were motivated by his constituents.

“My goal is to significantly reduce the amount of dispensaries and we accomplished that goal on Tuesday (Dec. 14),” he said. “It’s hard to predict the future, but I don’t expect any additional changes going forward. However, I do expect changes a year from now (when the moratorium on accepting applications ends).”

There is still some optimism that relocation will be allowed for the nine-plus collectives that are scheduled for displacement, Watson said.

“Everyone in my situation believes the city will allow for relocation,” he said.

Herbal Solutions also is holding out hope.

“Herbal Solutions Naples has publically offered to relocate its collective out of Naples in a good faith effort to address community concerns,” the statement said. “The city’s refusal to provide relocation is baffling and amounts to nothing more than a penalty and spot zoning. Herbal Solutions Naples remains hopeful that the council will vote to allow impacted collectives to relocate when the ordinance is considered again in January, but is prepared to take legal action to protect its rights in the event that the council insists on adopting an unjust and unlawful amendment.”

Watson said his lawyers are looking at the law in regards to vested rights issues and potential impact studies they feel the council should have authorized before voting on the law.

The City Council does have the right to revisit the issue in January (Jan. 4 is the next scheduled council meeting) before passing a second reading, assistant city attorney Mike Mais said. He said the city’s attorney’s office is confident the law will stand up in court regardless.

“We feel like we’re on legally solid ground,” he said. “We’ll do our best to defend it.”

Source: Gazettes

Merchant Accounts for Dispensaries. Great Rates!

Tuesday, December 21, 2010

NEWS: Medical marijuana in Southwest Riverside County appears ‘up in smoke’ with recent decisions.

On Monday, Riverside County Superior Court Judge Mark Johnson ordered the Wildomar Patients Compassionate Group to close.

Stoking embers of controversy, SouthwestRivCo cities and Riverside County continue to fight against marijuana dispensaries.

Wildomar became the latest city to ban dispensaries, after a Riverside County judge ruled in its favor.

On Monday, Riverside County Superior Court Judge Mark Johnson ordered the Wildomar Patients Compassionate Group to close. A week earlier, Lake Elsinore City Council members voted to continue a moratorium on the businesses. Riverside County also reversed plans to allow dispensaries in certain areas and kept in place a county ordinance banning the dispensaries.

Wildomar Decision

Wildomar Patients Compassionate Group opened a dispensary in early December after filing a suit against the city. The group contends that the city’s ban on dispensaries contradicts state law granted safe accessing to medical marijuana.

The two sides were in court on Monday. Judge Johnson upheld the city’s ban and immediately ordered the existing Wildomar dispensary to close. The group’s attorney has stated he will file an appeal with the appellate court.

The city voted in 2008 to ban the dispensaries.


Lake Elsinore Decision

On December 14, Lake Elsinore council members continued a moratorium on dispensaries. The temporary ban dates back to Dec. 2009.

The city postponed a decision to wait and see the outcomes of legal proceedings and court ruling from other cities. At the time, the city wanted to see what leeway cities could have in limiting dispensaries.

The staff report for Tuesday’s meeting states the issue is still too undefined to take action on from a legal standpoint.

Riverside County

On the same day, that Lake Elsinore continued its ban, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors reversed plans to create zones where medical marijuana dispensaries could operate. Instead, supervisors decided to stick with an existing ban on marijuana shops.

The county had been working on zoning ordinances that would have allowed dispensaries in certain areas. The supervisors decided to stick with the current ban after watching neighboring counties enact bans.

Source: Southwest Riverside News Network

Sunday, October 24, 2010

VIDEO: Frank Sheftell's Public Comment on Medical Marijuana Collective at LA Council Meeting




MERCHANT CREDIT CARD PROCESSING
New or Existing Medical Marijuana Dispensaries
Best Rates Available

Contact Tony Mosqueda
anthonymosqueda@sbcglobal.net
818.397.1078 (24 hours a day)

Thursday, October 21, 2010

NEWS: Some compassionate pot shops caught in L.A. law's red tape

Legal loophole threatens some well-meaning, well-run collectives

They seem like just what California voters like me had in mind when we approved the "compassionate" use of marijuana to treat medical ills 14 years ago.

The Toluca Lake Collective operates out of a converted house on a quiet street, with no neon sign or ATM machine. It carries just six strains of marijuana — unlike the dozens some dispensaries offer. All are grown locally by members, and owner Frank Sheftel can tell you which works best to relieve pain, ease muscle spasms or just deliver a good night's sleep.

Across town, there's PureLife Alternative Wellness Center. It was created by cancer survivor Yami Bolanos as an alternative to "those blaring-music and strobe-light places, where you're taking advice from an 18-year-old with piercings all over her face," she said.

PureLife has a comfy lobby, high-end furniture, and rows of marijuana choices and medical information. The shop hosts tours for city officials and law enforcement officers and was selected by collective owners as the best example of a well-run place.

Both have been around since 2006 and were supposed to be among the 186 collectives "grandfathered" in when the city adopted tough medical marijuana restrictions that put hundreds of dispensaries out of business this year.

But they have wound up among 130 original collectives now threatened with closure because of — depending on how you see it — either a paperwork glitch or a dirty trick.

In Sheftel's case, his required registration was "inadvertently misdirected by city staff." The city acknowledged as much in a notation adding him to the approved list in 2008. But he has since been dropped from the list on the grounds that he missed the deadline when he filed his paperwork in Van Nuys instead of the clerk's office downtown.

Bolanos is caught in a bigger problem. PureLife is one of 58 collectives targeted for closure because they may have hired or fired a manager since they first applied.

"It's ridiculous for them to disqualify me because I have hired a manager," said Bolanos. "I want my business to be run well, so I have family members helping me manage now. What do they think I'm supposed to do when I can't be here? Is that a reason to shut us down?"

It's not as if the city is going easy on dispensaries now. After years of watching pot shops proliferate, the City Council this year passed one of the toughest marijuana regulation laws in the state. It requires dispensaries to be patient-dominated collectives, located at least 1,000 feet from schools, parks, libraries and homes, closed by 8 each night and without neon cannabis-leaf signs.

The regulations were a product of more than two years of contentious debate. I guess it's no wonder that a few things got mashed up in the soup-making. The new ordinance allowed the immediate shut-down of more than 400 dispensaries that had sprung up after the moratorium and validated only those that had opened before.

But among those, it excluded dispensaries that had changed ownership or management. The city attorney's office interprets that to mean that if a collective has hired or fired a manager since 2007, it no longer qualifies as an original.

And although it has not yet moved to shut those down, the city attorney's office has left them off the list of legal collectives and filed suit to keep them off.

"We want to be legal, but he wants to get rid of us," complained Bolanos, president of the Greater Los Angeles Collective's Alliance, referring to the city attorney. "I really believe this is very political, because the city attorney doesn't believe there should be such a thing as medical marijuana."

Councilwoman Janice Hahn isn't willing to go that far, but she is co-sponsoring an amendment to the ordinance that would put those collectives back on the list by allowing them to qualify as long as they "maintain at least one primary owner and/or manager" from their original registration.

"It's unfortunate that the city attorney misinterpreted our intent when it comes to a change in management," Hahn said. Allowing management changes is not just a question of fairness but of good business, Hahn said.

"I want them to have the flexibility to run a decent, safe, responsible business," she said. "They ought to have the right to make a management change if they need it."

The city attorney's office doesn't see it that way. "We have an obligation to enforce the plain-vanilla language of the rules," said Jane Usher, a special assistant city attorney handling the dozens of lawsuits swirling around the regulations.

The motion to amend the ordinance is scheduled to be heard by the City Council today. But Usher wants the discussion delayed until a judge rules next month on motions filed by dispensaries challenging the city's law.

Source: Los Angeles Times


MERCHANT CREDIT CARD PROCESSING
New or Existing Medical Marijuana Dispensaries.
Best Rates Available.

Contact Tony Mosqueda
anthonymosqueda@sbcglobal.net
818.397.1078 (24 hours a day)

Saturday, September 4, 2010

People's Pharmacy: Medical marijuana shows promise in cancer cases

A reader asks whether cannabinoids can fight pancreatic tumor cells.
By Joe Graedon and Teresa Graedon, Ph.D.

Q: I would like you to know about medical marijuana for cancer. In her late 30s, my wife was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer, stage 4a. It was a 6-centimeter tumor that had grown around the hepatic artery and portal vein.

At first I thought marijuana was just for nausea caused by her chemo, but then I found a study in the journal Cancer Research (July 1, 2006). It showed that cannabinoids specifically fight pancreatic tumor cells.

I changed her diet and started her on a regimen, and she is now cancer-free. The regimen is being studied at the University of Wisconsin.

A: For years, marijuana research was suspected of being a way to rationalize people getting high. But as a recent article in Science News points out, scientists are now starting to take it seriously (June 19). The article you cite demonstrates that compounds from marijuana make pancreatic- tumor cells commit suicide.

Other cancer researchers have followed up with studies on its effectiveness against a range of tumors in test tubes, including breast, colon, glioblastoma brain tumors and lymphoma, a blood cancer. None is yet in a clinical trial, but this will be an interesting field to watch. We are delighted your wife had such a good response to such a difficult-to-treat cancer.

Q: I tried the soap-under-the-sheet remedy for leg cramps. It was successful, but it didn't last. Then my doctor prescribed Qualaquin 325-mg capsules, and they work like a charm.

This medication has quinine and is usually used for the treatment of malaria. Now I take one every other night, with excellent results.

A: The Food and Drug Administration has only approved Qualaquin (quinine) for the treatment of malaria. Any other use is considered "off label" and inappropriate. On July 8, the FDA issued the following warning: "Qualaquin should not be used for nighttime leg cramps."

The agency has received reports of serious blood reactions and kidney damage. In some cases, people have died from quinine toxicity.

Some readers have suggested that replacing the soap after several weeks might improve its effectiveness.

Q: What is the story about the toxic effects of zinc in denture creams?

A: Too much zinc, whether from dental adhesives or taken as a supplement, can lead to a copper deficiency. The possible consequences are anemia and neurological problems.

The New York Times Magazine described a 64-year-old woman who overused denture cream. Her balance was affected, along with the strength in her legs. Her doctors discovered that she had super-high levels of zinc and almost no copper in her bloodstream. They tracked the problem to the adhesive she used to keep her ill-fitting dentures in place.

GSK, maker of Super PoliGrip, has reformulated its denture-adhesive cream. The company urges consumers to look for the zinc-free product. The FDA is working with other manufacturers to reduce the risk that consumers might be exposed to excessive levels of zinc in their denture creams.

Source: The Seattle Times

Share


Tuesday, August 31, 2010

Anaheim Dispensaries, Collectives and Co-ops

Anaheim Palliative Care Center (APCC)
1125 Magnolia Ave. Suite 105 [map]
Anaheim, CA 92801
Hours: Mon-Sat 11am to 8pm, Sun 12pm to 6pm
Website: www.anaheimpalliativecarecenter.com
Phone: 714-821-KUSH

Green City Collective Inc.
1671 W. Katella Ave. Suite 105
Anaheim, CA 92802
Hours: Mon-Sat 10am to 10pm, Sun 10am to 6pm
Phone: 714-635-9600

Mid-County Patients Association
3164 E. La Palma Ave. Suite P [map]
Anaheim, CA 92806
Hours: Mon-Sun 10am to 7pm
Phone: 714-630-6272
Website: http://midcountypatients.org/

Covers the following zip codes in Anaheim, California: 92801, 92802, 92803, 92804, 92805, 92806, 92807, 92808, 92809, 92812, 92814, 92815, 92816, 92817, 92825, 92850, 92899

Share

Saturday, August 28, 2010

NEWS: L.A. strictly interprets restriction on pot dispensaries

When the Los Angeles City Council adopted its medical marijuana ordinance, it aimed to rout unscrupulous dispensary operators whose unruly customers irritated residents and operators who opened up willy-nilly across the city, ignoring a ban on new stores.

But the ordinance has snared operators who appear to have tried hard to adhere to state law and the city's rules. Among them are some of the most politically active operators whose dispensaries are considered model operations. Last week, the city sued these dispensaries and dozens of others and asked a judge to rule that they could be shut down.

The ordinance, which went into effect in June, allowed dispensaries that registered with the city by Nov. 13, 2007, to apply to stay open, but it required them to have "the same ownership and management." The city attorney's office has decided that means the owners and managers must be the same people who held those positions three years ago.

When Barry Kramer opened California Patients Alliance in April 2007, he ran it alone. "I was the manager. I was the operator. I was the secretary. I was everything," he said. Now, with about 1,500 members, the Beverly Grove dispensary has added two managers. "I can't be here seven days a week," Kramer said. "I don't see any legal basis for saying a business is not allowed to expand."

Under the city's interpretation of the ordinance, if a dispensary's manager died, quit or was fired and was then replaced, it must close. If the business grew and added managers, it must close. If it shrank and let managers go, it must close. If it was sold to new owners, it must close.

"It makes it completely irrational. This is life. Things happen," said David Welch, a lawyer who represents more than 60 dispensaries. "It almost puts an impossible burden on collectives."

Stewart Richlin, another attorney for dispensaries, noted that the city did not tell registered dispensaries in 2007 that they could not change owners or managers, and he pointed to a 2009 planning department memo that says the city "does not prohibit ownership changes."

"This is America," he said. "Every business can be transferred."

The city attorney's office said it must interpret the ordinance strictly, saying any discretion would expose the ordinance to legal attacks. "We are constantly thinking of the greater good, which is an enforceable ordinance," said Jane Usher, a special assistant city attorney who helped draft the law and is defending it against 32 lawsuits filed by dispensaries that were ordered to shut down.

Usher said the language that the City Council adopted is unambiguous: no change in ownership, no change in management. "There was a very clear road map," she said, "and I don't know why dispensaries didn't follow it, but I assume they didn't follow it because they couldn't."

David and Irina Vayntrub learned last week that their dispensary, Absolute Herbal Pain Solutions, was ineligible to stay open.

"I was shocked," said David Vayntrub, holding up a point-by-point summary of the ordinance that his wife had typed up and that he keeps on his desk. "This is in front of me every day."

The Vayntrubs think the city disqualified their dispensary because Irina, who they said has been involved since the store opened in January 2007, is now the secretary of the board. Under the city attorney's interpretation, that might be a management change. They are not certain, though; they said city officials did not respond to the five voice messages they left last week.

"I'm still here. Same manager. Same owner," said David Vayntrub, who said he works at the store on South La Brea Avenue every day. "We truly tried to follow this ordinance."

The city clerk last week notified 128 of the 169 registered dispensaries that they were ineligible to remain open. The city filed a lawsuit against the ineligible dispensaries, but they will be allowed to operate until a judge considers the suit.

According to the suit, 120 were ineligible because of management changes. Of those, 58 were disqualified solely on that basis; the others also had ownership changes and other issues.

The clerk's office is trying to figure out how to respond to distraught dispensary operators. "I'm trying to iron that out now," Holly Wolcott, its executive officer, said last week.

Councilman Ed Reyes, who oversaw the drafting of the ordinance, said the city needed to "stick with the letter of the law" but promised to assess the effect on dispensaries.

Some disqualified operators will be familiar to Reyes because they have been active at City Hall for years. All of them are original operators and were excluded for management changes.

Besides Kramer, they include Yamileth Bolanos, who runs PureLife Alternative Wellness Center and heads a group of about 60 original dispensaries; Michael Backes with Cornerstone Research Collective, which focuses on severely ill patients; James Shaw with Arts District Healing Center, who runs the Union of Medical Marijuana Patients; and Bill Leahy, who manages the Farmacy stores, which were started by a pharmacist, JoAnna LaForce.

"I can't tell you how surprised we all were," said Leahy, adding that the city is targeting registered dispensaries when it has failed to shut down numerous unauthorized outlets. "Most of them have reopened again and the city's done very little about it."

Some ineligible dispensaries appear to be victims of a Catch-22 or two.

Almost a year after dispensaries were required to register in Los Angeles, the state attorney general advised that they needed to be run as nonprofit collectives. Many were not. So they reorganized as nonprofit corporations, a change that replaced an owner with a board of directors. Under the city attorney's interpretation of the ordinance, that may have disqualified them.

This summer, when the city started to determine whether the registered dispensaries were qualified to remain open, it sent them a letter asking for "the name(s) of the collective's management." Because the ordinance defines managers as anyone responsible for "organization, registration, supervision, or oversight," some dispensaries included names of employees that were not on their original registration forms, which may have disqualified them.

More than a few wonder whether it was a trap. "We all knew they were looking for some slimy little technicality, and this seems to be it," Kramer said.

Chris Fusco, a consultant who knows the ins and outs of City Hall, said that when he inquired about the letter, he was told by officials at the clerk's office that an exact match was required. But others, including the Vayntrubs, said they were not.

"The administration of the application process is just like nothing I have ever seen or known or imagined," Fusco said. "It's a black curtain, and what's behind it, no one will tell you."

Source: Los Angeles Times

Share