If you know of an event that you feel should be listed on our calendar, please send details to info@mjdispensaries.com ~Thank You
Showing posts with label lottery. Show all posts
Showing posts with label lottery. Show all posts
Friday, October 8, 2010
Thursday, October 7, 2010
Monday, September 20, 2010
NEWS: Long Beach holds lottery for medical marijuana collective permits
LONG BEACH - The dreams of 11 medical marijuana collectives went up in smoke Monday afternoon.
The collectives will be forced to close after they lost a lottery held Monday in the City Council chamber at City Hall. The lottery is part of the permitting process established under Long Beach's new medical marijuana law and determined which collectives can move forward to the next stage in the process.
Thirty-two out of 43 collectives that had submitted permit applications will do just that, although for some, the lottery was just a formality.
Under the new ordinance, collectives aren't allowed to be within 1,000 feet of each other. While 25 collectives didn't have that problem, the other 18 did, 11 of which were eliminated.
Among the lottery winners, five collectives also each have a separate cultivation site, which is allowed by the ordinance, bringing the total number of marijuana sites to 37. Those that passed the lottery still must go through a process of building inspections, public notice and hearings before they receive their permits.
No more collectives will be allowed to open in Long Beach until the city starts a new permit application period, which has yet to be determined.
Taso Nikolaou, who operates Cannabis Evaluation Center at 5595 E. Seventh St., breathed a sigh of relief outside the council chamber after his lottery number was called out before that of his competitor.
"I asked God for help. I went to church this morning, lit a candle," Nikolaou said. "I'm ecstatic right now."
Although many collective operators have spoken out against some of the requirements and the process of the medical marijuana ordinance, Nikolaou said he was just happy to see Long Beach accept the need for collectives.
"I think they're finally getting to a point where they can regulate the industry and provide safe access" to medical marijuana, he said.
One aspect of the ordinance that has met strong opposition was a $14,742 non-refundable permit application fee.
Unlike Nikolaou's collective, Jim Stienecker's Wardlow Collective west of Long Beach Airport lost the lottery, leaving him empty-handed - no permit and almost $15,000 gone.
"It's not really fair to go into something when you don't know the odds," said a visibly upset Stienecker.
He said he had invested "multiple tens of thousands of dollars" into his collective, though he conceded that he had just opened the collective seven or eight weeks ago and knew there were risks.
Still, Stienecker said, he is most concerned about his 350 patient members, to whom he provides medical marijuana "so that they don't have to go to a street dealer and feel like a criminal."
Despite the high emotion, Monday's lottery was eerily silent as the crowd of about 130 waited in anticipation.
The drawing was a far cry from the dozens of council meetings over the past year that have been packed with vocal and passionate medical marijuana advocates who queued up to give the council a piece of their minds.
The council approved the medical marijuana law in March to control the growing number of collectives and created the permit process in May. The ordinance prohibits collectives from residential areas, creates buffer zones around schools and sets many other requirements.
Much like those council meetings, Monday's lottery didn't turn out to be a simple process.
The lottery balls, each printed with an identification number corresponding to the collectives, didn't fit through the tube of the air-mixed lottery machine. So, City Clerk Larry Herrera ended up drawing the balls out of a blue recycling bin, shaking it each time before the drawing.
Muffled cheers and curses could be heard as the winners in the contested areas were announced, which pretty much made clear who the losers were. Overall, the crowd stayed calm, perhaps due in part to a high police presence and the requirement that anyone entering the chamber be scanned with a metal detector.
Erik Sund, the city's business relations manager who is in charge of the medical marijuana permit process, said he had asked for extra police officers at the lottery, "keeping in mind that there were going to be people that won and people that lost, and some people can be sore losers."
Source: Contra Costa Times
The collectives will be forced to close after they lost a lottery held Monday in the City Council chamber at City Hall. The lottery is part of the permitting process established under Long Beach's new medical marijuana law and determined which collectives can move forward to the next stage in the process.
Thirty-two out of 43 collectives that had submitted permit applications will do just that, although for some, the lottery was just a formality.
Under the new ordinance, collectives aren't allowed to be within 1,000 feet of each other. While 25 collectives didn't have that problem, the other 18 did, 11 of which were eliminated.
Among the lottery winners, five collectives also each have a separate cultivation site, which is allowed by the ordinance, bringing the total number of marijuana sites to 37. Those that passed the lottery still must go through a process of building inspections, public notice and hearings before they receive their permits.
No more collectives will be allowed to open in Long Beach until the city starts a new permit application period, which has yet to be determined.
Taso Nikolaou, who operates Cannabis Evaluation Center at 5595 E. Seventh St., breathed a sigh of relief outside the council chamber after his lottery number was called out before that of his competitor.
"I asked God for help. I went to church this morning, lit a candle," Nikolaou said. "I'm ecstatic right now."
Although many collective operators have spoken out against some of the requirements and the process of the medical marijuana ordinance, Nikolaou said he was just happy to see Long Beach accept the need for collectives.
"I think they're finally getting to a point where they can regulate the industry and provide safe access" to medical marijuana, he said.
One aspect of the ordinance that has met strong opposition was a $14,742 non-refundable permit application fee.
Unlike Nikolaou's collective, Jim Stienecker's Wardlow Collective west of Long Beach Airport lost the lottery, leaving him empty-handed - no permit and almost $15,000 gone.
"It's not really fair to go into something when you don't know the odds," said a visibly upset Stienecker.
He said he had invested "multiple tens of thousands of dollars" into his collective, though he conceded that he had just opened the collective seven or eight weeks ago and knew there were risks.
Still, Stienecker said, he is most concerned about his 350 patient members, to whom he provides medical marijuana "so that they don't have to go to a street dealer and feel like a criminal."
Despite the high emotion, Monday's lottery was eerily silent as the crowd of about 130 waited in anticipation.
The drawing was a far cry from the dozens of council meetings over the past year that have been packed with vocal and passionate medical marijuana advocates who queued up to give the council a piece of their minds.
The council approved the medical marijuana law in March to control the growing number of collectives and created the permit process in May. The ordinance prohibits collectives from residential areas, creates buffer zones around schools and sets many other requirements.
Much like those council meetings, Monday's lottery didn't turn out to be a simple process.
The lottery balls, each printed with an identification number corresponding to the collectives, didn't fit through the tube of the air-mixed lottery machine. So, City Clerk Larry Herrera ended up drawing the balls out of a blue recycling bin, shaking it each time before the drawing.
Erik Sund, the city's business relations manager who is in charge of the medical marijuana permit process, said he had asked for extra police officers at the lottery, "keeping in mind that there were going to be people that won and people that lost, and some people can be sore losers."
Source: Contra Costa Times
Wednesday, September 15, 2010
NEWS: Marijuana Co-ops To Roll Dice
Lottery numbers have been issued to 43 nonprofit medical marijuana collectives in Long Beach, and those collectives’ names have been released. On Monday, each will find out its lottery fate.
A lottery system was implemented to resolve the last bit of Municipal Code 5.87 — the fact that collectives are not allowed to operate within 1,000 feet of one another. All other sections of the law officially went into effect on Aug. 29.
Names and addresses of the collectives that will be a part of the lottery have been compiled on the city’s Web site, www.longbeach.gov/finance/business_relations/medical_marijuana.asp.
During the lottery, each collective’s number that is pulled gives that collective preference in regards to the 1,000-feet requirement over any other pulled afterwards.
“So now, Sept. 20 — 3 p.m., City Council chambers — is the day of the lottery,” said Erik Sund, the city’s business relations manager. “We are preparing ourselves. We are going to be ready for it. That is the day we’ll theoretically pull the lottery numbers and implement the next step of the ordinance.”
According to Sund, from 30 to 35 collectives are expected to move forward out of the lottery. After that, the city will have 60 days to complete inspections, public noticing and to conduct final permit hearings.
“They have to pass all of those hurdles before they actually get that permit in hand,” he said.
Previously, Sund had estimated that about 95 collectives existed within Long Beach before Municipal Code 5.87 went into effect. The new law was going to eliminate more than 50% of those collectives due to the restrictions on how close they could be to schools. Under the law, collectives cannot operate within 1,000 feet of any school servicing grades kindergarten through eighth grade and collectives cannot operate within 1,500 feet of high schools.
Before the original June 18 deadline for accepting applications, Sund said he received 54 requests for a permit. That number has since shrunk to 49 — six of which are for separate cultivation sites — so 43 collectives in total.
“Five applications were deemed incomplete, resulting in 49 potential cultivation and collection sites going into the process,” Sund said.
Each request for a permit requires an application fee of between $10,000 and $30,000, depending on how large the collective is.
Only one lottery number was given to collectives that had a separate cultivation site application. If that number is drawn, both the collective and cultivation sites are considered together when applying the 1,000-foot standard, Sund said.
Whether a collective is disqualified before or during the lottery, that collective will not receive its application money back.
“The ordinance was very clear that the application fee was non-refundable,” Sund added.
Sund also said that there should be no fears of any one owner taking advantage of the lottery system, because the ordinance does not allow for the same owner or director to apply for different collectives.
“I can’t apply for multiple locations,” he said. “I can apply for a collective to distribute my marijuana and also a cultivation site on which to grow my marijuana. Referring to the ordinance, it says you can’t be a manager member for a number of different collectives.”
Despite public accusations and protests from a disqualified collective claiming that its money was taken disingenuously and a lawsuit pending from another regarding the school restrictions, Sund said the application period has gone relatively well.
“I think the process is running pretty smoothly,” he said. “I think we’ve been able to handle it.”
Source: Gazette Newspapers
A lottery system was implemented to resolve the last bit of Municipal Code 5.87 — the fact that collectives are not allowed to operate within 1,000 feet of one another. All other sections of the law officially went into effect on Aug. 29.
Names and addresses of the collectives that will be a part of the lottery have been compiled on the city’s Web site, www.longbeach.gov/finance/business_relations/medical_marijuana.asp.
During the lottery, each collective’s number that is pulled gives that collective preference in regards to the 1,000-feet requirement over any other pulled afterwards.
“So now, Sept. 20 — 3 p.m., City Council chambers — is the day of the lottery,” said Erik Sund, the city’s business relations manager. “We are preparing ourselves. We are going to be ready for it. That is the day we’ll theoretically pull the lottery numbers and implement the next step of the ordinance.”
According to Sund, from 30 to 35 collectives are expected to move forward out of the lottery. After that, the city will have 60 days to complete inspections, public noticing and to conduct final permit hearings.
“They have to pass all of those hurdles before they actually get that permit in hand,” he said.
Previously, Sund had estimated that about 95 collectives existed within Long Beach before Municipal Code 5.87 went into effect. The new law was going to eliminate more than 50% of those collectives due to the restrictions on how close they could be to schools. Under the law, collectives cannot operate within 1,000 feet of any school servicing grades kindergarten through eighth grade and collectives cannot operate within 1,500 feet of high schools.
Before the original June 18 deadline for accepting applications, Sund said he received 54 requests for a permit. That number has since shrunk to 49 — six of which are for separate cultivation sites — so 43 collectives in total.
“Five applications were deemed incomplete, resulting in 49 potential cultivation and collection sites going into the process,” Sund said.
Each request for a permit requires an application fee of between $10,000 and $30,000, depending on how large the collective is.
Only one lottery number was given to collectives that had a separate cultivation site application. If that number is drawn, both the collective and cultivation sites are considered together when applying the 1,000-foot standard, Sund said.
Whether a collective is disqualified before or during the lottery, that collective will not receive its application money back.
“The ordinance was very clear that the application fee was non-refundable,” Sund added.
Sund also said that there should be no fears of any one owner taking advantage of the lottery system, because the ordinance does not allow for the same owner or director to apply for different collectives.
“I can’t apply for multiple locations,” he said. “I can apply for a collective to distribute my marijuana and also a cultivation site on which to grow my marijuana. Referring to the ordinance, it says you can’t be a manager member for a number of different collectives.”
Despite public accusations and protests from a disqualified collective claiming that its money was taken disingenuously and a lawsuit pending from another regarding the school restrictions, Sund said the application period has gone relatively well.
“I think the process is running pretty smoothly,” he said. “I think we’ve been able to handle it.”
Source: Gazette Newspapers
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
