3.6 Collective
7351 Garden Grove Blvd, Suite B [map]
Garden Grove, CA 92841
Hours: Mon-Sat 10am to 9pm, Sun 11am to 7pm
Phone: 714-650-4000
Email: 36collective@gmail.com
Euclid Medical Center
12079 Euclid Street (Ralphs shopping center) [map]
Garden Grove, CA 92840
Hours: Sun-Thu 10am to 10pm, Fri-Sat 10am to 11pm
Phone: 714-650-0228
Website: http://euclidmedical.com/
Golden Nug
13631 Harbor Blvd. Unit A (Front Unit) [map]
Garden Grove, CA 92843
Hours: Mon-Sun 9am to 12am
Phone: 714-610-1641
Website: http://thegoldennug.com/
Natures Holistic Alternative Patients Association (NHAPA)
13862 A Better Way Unit 9D [map]
Garden Grove, CA 92843
Phone: 714-741-3989
Hours: Mon-Sat 11am to 8pm, Sun 11am to 5pm
Website: naturesalternativepa.org
New Age Canna
9758 Chapman Ave. [map]
Garden Grove, CA 92841
Hours: Mon-Sun 10am-9p
Phone: 714-539-KUSH (5874)
Website: http://www.newagecanna.com
If you know of an event that you feel should be listed on our calendar, please send details to info@mjdispensaries.com ~Thank You
Latest Headlines and Information
Showing posts with label co-op. Show all posts
Showing posts with label co-op. Show all posts
Friday, July 1, 2011
Sunday, November 14, 2010
NEWS: Temecula medical marijuana co-op set for Monday opening
Despite warnings from the city, a medical marijuana activist said a co-op created to help patients get their medicine will open its doors in Temecula on Monday.
Douglas Lanphere said Cooperative Patients' Services will provide a secure venue for legitimate medical marijuana patients to exchange the drug with each other. The establishment, in a leased storefront on the southern end of Old Town Front Street past First Street, will allow members to bring marijuana in for processing, he said.
California voters legalized marijuana use for medicinal purposes in 1996. While several Temecula businesses offer medical marijuana referrals, the city has banned dispensaries since 2004.
Lanphere maintains the ban doesn't apply to the co-op. No marijuana sales will take place since the co-op members collectively own the marijuana, according to Lanphere.
"We facilitate the transactions between members," he said. "We're not the (entity) that makes the transaction directly with the patient."
City officials disagree with Lanphere's reasoning and say the code makes no exception for co-ops.
"We'll just have to wait and see exactly what he does or does not do there," City Attorney Peter Thorson said Friday.
Only co-op members will have access to the marijuana, and the co-op will have guards and other security measures in place, Lanphere said.
"We're not going to have pot plants in the lobby," he said, adding that most patients consume marijuana through liquid or forms other than smoking.
Lanphere and others have met with city officials and spoken at City Council meetings about the need for a safe facility for medical marijuana patients to get their medicine. Earlier this year, the group received a business license to operate as Qualified Patients Resource Center.
It got another business license in September under the name Cooperative Patients' Services, which is classified by the city as a "resource center." The new license, however, includes wording that mentions the city's dispensary ban and forbids "any other use or action that violates any provision" of the city code.
Lanphere believes a state court ruling issued in August on Anaheim's dispensary ban gives the co-op the legal right to operate. He said the decision makes it clear that federal law, which outlaws marijuana, does not pre-empt California's medical marijuana laws.
Thorson said the city zoning law is "very clear" about medical marijuana and that the Anaheim decision does not legitimize the co-op.
The city will need to figure out what's going on at the co-op before taking action, Thorson said.
Lanphere said the city has tried to stall the co-op's opening, an accusation Thorson denied. The co-op is prepared to challenge any citations, Lanphere said.
"We're of the belief that we've done everything transparently," Lanphere said.
Source: The Press-Enterprise
Douglas Lanphere said Cooperative Patients' Services will provide a secure venue for legitimate medical marijuana patients to exchange the drug with each other. The establishment, in a leased storefront on the southern end of Old Town Front Street past First Street, will allow members to bring marijuana in for processing, he said.
California voters legalized marijuana use for medicinal purposes in 1996. While several Temecula businesses offer medical marijuana referrals, the city has banned dispensaries since 2004.
Lanphere maintains the ban doesn't apply to the co-op. No marijuana sales will take place since the co-op members collectively own the marijuana, according to Lanphere.
"We facilitate the transactions between members," he said. "We're not the (entity) that makes the transaction directly with the patient."
City officials disagree with Lanphere's reasoning and say the code makes no exception for co-ops.
"We'll just have to wait and see exactly what he does or does not do there," City Attorney Peter Thorson said Friday.
Only co-op members will have access to the marijuana, and the co-op will have guards and other security measures in place, Lanphere said.
"We're not going to have pot plants in the lobby," he said, adding that most patients consume marijuana through liquid or forms other than smoking.
Lanphere and others have met with city officials and spoken at City Council meetings about the need for a safe facility for medical marijuana patients to get their medicine. Earlier this year, the group received a business license to operate as Qualified Patients Resource Center.
It got another business license in September under the name Cooperative Patients' Services, which is classified by the city as a "resource center." The new license, however, includes wording that mentions the city's dispensary ban and forbids "any other use or action that violates any provision" of the city code.
Lanphere believes a state court ruling issued in August on Anaheim's dispensary ban gives the co-op the legal right to operate. He said the decision makes it clear that federal law, which outlaws marijuana, does not pre-empt California's medical marijuana laws.
Thorson said the city zoning law is "very clear" about medical marijuana and that the Anaheim decision does not legitimize the co-op.
The city will need to figure out what's going on at the co-op before taking action, Thorson said.
Lanphere said the city has tried to stall the co-op's opening, an accusation Thorson denied. The co-op is prepared to challenge any citations, Lanphere said.
"We're of the belief that we've done everything transparently," Lanphere said.
Source: The Press-Enterprise
Labels:
co-op,
medical marijuana,
opening,
temecula
Monday, October 18, 2010
NEWS: San Diego County Narcotics Task Force Detectives Open and Operate Medical Marijuana Dispensary in San Diego
By: Eugene Davidovich, October 18, 2010
The undercover officers dubbed themselves as ‘New Management’ before detaining and interrogating unsuspecting patients walking into the dispensary that day.
SAN DIEGO –Thursday morning of last week, San Diego County Narcotics Task Force (NTF) detectives arrested James Harder a founding member of the Helping Hands Wellness Collective at his home in San Diego. The detectives also served search warrants at the dispensary located on 5th Avenue in Hillcrest. The arrest and search of the dispensary was the extent of what the search and arrest warrants authorized the NTF to do that that day.
After booking Harder into San Diego County Jail, NTF Detective Mark Andrew Carlson however was not finished. He ordered his team to dawn orange Helping Hands Wellness shirts and open the dispensary on time at 10am, taking San Diego District Attorney (DA) Bonnie Dumanis’ fierce fight against medical marijuana to a whole new level.
Mark Carlson is the same detective who for over two years, under the direct orders of Deputy DA Chris Lindbergh led the investigation and helped prosecute Jovan Jackson of Answerdam collective. After Jackson was vindicated of all marijuana related charges in his first trial, Carlson was instrumental in convincing the DA’s office to continue with the second prosecution and trial.
According to Matt, one of the patients who visited the dispensary that day, detectives welcomed him to the collective, told him the facility was under ‘new management’, checked him in, and even provided him with free concentrated cannabis (hash) as a gift before inquiring with the unsuspecting patient whether he cultivated his own medicine. As soon as Matt told them that he did, the detectives pulled out their badges, said they were DEA, and then proceeded to detain and interrogate him for almost two hours.
San Diego Americans for Safe Access (SDASA), the local chapter of the nation’s largest advocacy group advancing therapeutic use and research medical marijuana, received a call on Thursday around noon from another patient who said the Helping Hands Collective was “taken over” by law enforcement. The call was followed by an email to SDASA from a sales representative of San Diego CityBeat, who also stopped into the dispensary that day to visit their advertising client only to find out that the place is ‘under new management’.
Upon receipt of these reports, SDASA quickly activated the local Raid Response Team (RRT). The team was successfully able to verify, confirm, and notify the community of the raid within minutes of the initial reports.
San Diego CityBeat reported on the story that afternoon, quoting Matt as saying, “They kept asking how much medicine do I buy, how am I affording it, where am I getting it from, what cooperatives I’m a member of where my garden is, they just basically, in a easy sentence, they raped me for everything I had and never told me I had a right to remain silent. They made me think if I didn’t talk they would arrest me on the spot.”
The NTF detectives were operating the collective from 10am to 2pm before being forced to cease their activity by San Diego Americans for Safe Access advocates, who quickly arrived on the scene.
Aside from the quick response, members of SDASA’s RRT that day, successfully and lawfully intervened and were able to stop to the NTF from operating the collective and putting additional patients at risk of this rogue action by San Diego NTF detectives.
San Diego Americans for Safe Access – Raid Response Team Eye Witness Account:
After receiving the call from a patient on Thursday morning, I first called Helping Hands to verify the reports of a ‘take over’. A male voice in a very polite manner answered the phone saying “Helping Hands, how may I help you today?”
I asked the male, “Is the collective open today?”
My question was quickly answered with another question. “Are you a customer or a vendor?”
This immediately raised a red flag for me and added to my suspicion that the person on the other line, was not a member of the collective but was in fact an undercover police officer posing as a member. I asked myself, “has the NTF actually stooped to this level?”
I proceeded to tell the person on the line, “My name is Eugene Davidovich and I’m calling from San Diego Americans for Safe Access, can we speak to a member of this collective?”
The male answered, “Hold on let me let you speak with the manager.”
After a short delay, another male got on the phone, and this time said “Who is this, can I help you?”
The voice was very familiar and only one name came to mind; Detective Mark Andrew Carlson, San Diego NTF detective who was the lead investigator in the Jovan Jackson case.
I introduced myself to the supposed “patient” and asked to speak to a member of the collective again. This time the undercover told me “hold on” and the line went dead.
Following this conversation, I activated the SDASA RRT and headed for the facility in Hillcrest.
Before I arrived at the collective, Terrie Best, another member of the RRT was already on the scene conducting an onsite survey. By the time I arrived, Terrie reported finding no evidence of police activity in front of the collective and at first, everything appeared to be normal. No police cars, DEA trucks or any other law enforcement activity was visible. The facility appeared open, and we could see people moving inside through the windows.
As soon as Terrie and I walked up to the front entrance of the facility, the lock in the glass tinted doors clicked shut. I knocked on the door and through the tinted window could see someone wearing an orange Helping Hands T-Shirt motioning to us with a finger that he would be right with us.
After not being let in through the fount doors, we walked around the back of the building into the alley.
This is when we realized the reports were true. The NTF had taken over the collective and was operating it under the guise of “new management”.
Six large F150 trucks were parked in the alley in back of the facility. A large white trailer was pushed up to the back door of the collective and almost a dozen undercover officers were scurrying back and forth loading unmarked boxes and bags in to the trailer.
After several minutes of watching the officers pack the trailer, I saw Detective Carlson walk out from the back of the collective. The minute he saw me, he screamed “Eugene, get out of here”.
While Carlson was busy venting his anger out at me, Terrie was busy questioning the other detectives as to why they were there, what agency they were with, etc.
I could hear Terrie ask one of the undercover officers, “are you San Diego County Sheriff or DEA”?
The undercover replied, “I’m a Sheriff from one of 58 Sheriff’s Department in the State”.
“Which one”? Terrie asked.
After hesitating for a moment the detective finally caved in and admitted, “I am with the Santa Barbara County Sheriff’s Department”.
“Why did you raid this collective?” Terrie continued.
The undercover replied, “That’s a part of an ongoing investigation, and I can’t talk about it unless you are with the media, are you with the media?”
“No I am not”, Terrie replied. “But what would you tell me if I was with the media?”
The detective could not resist Terrie’s friendly demeanor and sweet personality he told Terrie “I would tell you to call the Public Information Officer”.
“Great, what’s his name and number”, Terrie replied.
“That’s not Public information” the officer hissed.
Terrie was quick to point out that “you just told me that it was the ‘Public’ information officer was it not?”
The detective frustrated, let out a groan and walked away. Clearly perturbed with the SDASA RRT presence, Carlson proceeded to hurry all the detectives along to pack the trailer faster.
By this time Dennis and Melissa, two other members of the SDASA RRT arrived on the scene and joined our efforts.
As we continued to monitor the situation, one of the officers dressed in an orange Helping Hands t-shirt walked out of the collective and began to chit chat with the others, apparently forgetting that he was still dressed up as a ‘member’ of the collective.
I walked closer to him and called out “Excuse me sir, with the Helping Hands shirt, are you a member of this collective?”
The detective at first ignored me, then quickly two others ran up to him, and began to shout at the undercover, “I told you to stay inside, you are under arrest”.
When I realized, the detectives were trying to create the appearance that the person wearing the Helping Hands shirt, was actually a member under arrest and not an undercover officer, I couldn’t help but laugh at the pathetic attempt. Minutes later, a photographer from NBC arrived to document the events.
After seeing news cameras, detectives jumped in their cars and took off with tires screeching ending their day of opening and operating a dispensary.
Following this incident, I contacted Detective Carlson’s boss with the San Diego Police Department and inquired if Carlson was authorized as part of the investigation to operate the dispensary. His boss told me that he was not aware that the NTF was actually operating the facility. He said he was under the impression that San Diego detectives were simply assisting the Santa Barbara NTF in executing a search and arrest warrant.
Source: Americans for Safe Access (San Diego)
The undercover officers dubbed themselves as ‘New Management’ before detaining and interrogating unsuspecting patients walking into the dispensary that day.
SAN DIEGO –Thursday morning of last week, San Diego County Narcotics Task Force (NTF) detectives arrested James Harder a founding member of the Helping Hands Wellness Collective at his home in San Diego. The detectives also served search warrants at the dispensary located on 5th Avenue in Hillcrest. The arrest and search of the dispensary was the extent of what the search and arrest warrants authorized the NTF to do that that day.
After booking Harder into San Diego County Jail, NTF Detective Mark Andrew Carlson however was not finished. He ordered his team to dawn orange Helping Hands Wellness shirts and open the dispensary on time at 10am, taking San Diego District Attorney (DA) Bonnie Dumanis’ fierce fight against medical marijuana to a whole new level.
Mark Carlson is the same detective who for over two years, under the direct orders of Deputy DA Chris Lindbergh led the investigation and helped prosecute Jovan Jackson of Answerdam collective. After Jackson was vindicated of all marijuana related charges in his first trial, Carlson was instrumental in convincing the DA’s office to continue with the second prosecution and trial.
According to Matt, one of the patients who visited the dispensary that day, detectives welcomed him to the collective, told him the facility was under ‘new management’, checked him in, and even provided him with free concentrated cannabis (hash) as a gift before inquiring with the unsuspecting patient whether he cultivated his own medicine. As soon as Matt told them that he did, the detectives pulled out their badges, said they were DEA, and then proceeded to detain and interrogate him for almost two hours.
San Diego Americans for Safe Access (SDASA), the local chapter of the nation’s largest advocacy group advancing therapeutic use and research medical marijuana, received a call on Thursday around noon from another patient who said the Helping Hands Collective was “taken over” by law enforcement. The call was followed by an email to SDASA from a sales representative of San Diego CityBeat, who also stopped into the dispensary that day to visit their advertising client only to find out that the place is ‘under new management’.
Upon receipt of these reports, SDASA quickly activated the local Raid Response Team (RRT). The team was successfully able to verify, confirm, and notify the community of the raid within minutes of the initial reports.
San Diego CityBeat reported on the story that afternoon, quoting Matt as saying, “They kept asking how much medicine do I buy, how am I affording it, where am I getting it from, what cooperatives I’m a member of where my garden is, they just basically, in a easy sentence, they raped me for everything I had and never told me I had a right to remain silent. They made me think if I didn’t talk they would arrest me on the spot.”
The NTF detectives were operating the collective from 10am to 2pm before being forced to cease their activity by San Diego Americans for Safe Access advocates, who quickly arrived on the scene.
Aside from the quick response, members of SDASA’s RRT that day, successfully and lawfully intervened and were able to stop to the NTF from operating the collective and putting additional patients at risk of this rogue action by San Diego NTF detectives.
San Diego Americans for Safe Access – Raid Response Team Eye Witness Account:
After receiving the call from a patient on Thursday morning, I first called Helping Hands to verify the reports of a ‘take over’. A male voice in a very polite manner answered the phone saying “Helping Hands, how may I help you today?”
I asked the male, “Is the collective open today?”
My question was quickly answered with another question. “Are you a customer or a vendor?”
This immediately raised a red flag for me and added to my suspicion that the person on the other line, was not a member of the collective but was in fact an undercover police officer posing as a member. I asked myself, “has the NTF actually stooped to this level?”
I proceeded to tell the person on the line, “My name is Eugene Davidovich and I’m calling from San Diego Americans for Safe Access, can we speak to a member of this collective?”
The male answered, “Hold on let me let you speak with the manager.”
After a short delay, another male got on the phone, and this time said “Who is this, can I help you?”
The voice was very familiar and only one name came to mind; Detective Mark Andrew Carlson, San Diego NTF detective who was the lead investigator in the Jovan Jackson case.
I introduced myself to the supposed “patient” and asked to speak to a member of the collective again. This time the undercover told me “hold on” and the line went dead.
Following this conversation, I activated the SDASA RRT and headed for the facility in Hillcrest.
Before I arrived at the collective, Terrie Best, another member of the RRT was already on the scene conducting an onsite survey. By the time I arrived, Terrie reported finding no evidence of police activity in front of the collective and at first, everything appeared to be normal. No police cars, DEA trucks or any other law enforcement activity was visible. The facility appeared open, and we could see people moving inside through the windows.
As soon as Terrie and I walked up to the front entrance of the facility, the lock in the glass tinted doors clicked shut. I knocked on the door and through the tinted window could see someone wearing an orange Helping Hands T-Shirt motioning to us with a finger that he would be right with us.
After not being let in through the fount doors, we walked around the back of the building into the alley.
This is when we realized the reports were true. The NTF had taken over the collective and was operating it under the guise of “new management”.
Six large F150 trucks were parked in the alley in back of the facility. A large white trailer was pushed up to the back door of the collective and almost a dozen undercover officers were scurrying back and forth loading unmarked boxes and bags in to the trailer.
After several minutes of watching the officers pack the trailer, I saw Detective Carlson walk out from the back of the collective. The minute he saw me, he screamed “Eugene, get out of here”.
While Carlson was busy venting his anger out at me, Terrie was busy questioning the other detectives as to why they were there, what agency they were with, etc.
I could hear Terrie ask one of the undercover officers, “are you San Diego County Sheriff or DEA”?
The undercover replied, “I’m a Sheriff from one of 58 Sheriff’s Department in the State”.
“Which one”? Terrie asked.
After hesitating for a moment the detective finally caved in and admitted, “I am with the Santa Barbara County Sheriff’s Department”.
“Why did you raid this collective?” Terrie continued.
The undercover replied, “That’s a part of an ongoing investigation, and I can’t talk about it unless you are with the media, are you with the media?”
“No I am not”, Terrie replied. “But what would you tell me if I was with the media?”
The detective could not resist Terrie’s friendly demeanor and sweet personality he told Terrie “I would tell you to call the Public Information Officer”.
“Great, what’s his name and number”, Terrie replied.
“That’s not Public information” the officer hissed.
Terrie was quick to point out that “you just told me that it was the ‘Public’ information officer was it not?”
The detective frustrated, let out a groan and walked away. Clearly perturbed with the SDASA RRT presence, Carlson proceeded to hurry all the detectives along to pack the trailer faster.
By this time Dennis and Melissa, two other members of the SDASA RRT arrived on the scene and joined our efforts.
As we continued to monitor the situation, one of the officers dressed in an orange Helping Hands t-shirt walked out of the collective and began to chit chat with the others, apparently forgetting that he was still dressed up as a ‘member’ of the collective.
I walked closer to him and called out “Excuse me sir, with the Helping Hands shirt, are you a member of this collective?”
The detective at first ignored me, then quickly two others ran up to him, and began to shout at the undercover, “I told you to stay inside, you are under arrest”.
When I realized, the detectives were trying to create the appearance that the person wearing the Helping Hands shirt, was actually a member under arrest and not an undercover officer, I couldn’t help but laugh at the pathetic attempt. Minutes later, a photographer from NBC arrived to document the events.
After seeing news cameras, detectives jumped in their cars and took off with tires screeching ending their day of opening and operating a dispensary.
Following this incident, I contacted Detective Carlson’s boss with the San Diego Police Department and inquired if Carlson was authorized as part of the investigation to operate the dispensary. His boss told me that he was not aware that the NTF was actually operating the facility. He said he was under the impression that San Diego detectives were simply assisting the Santa Barbara NTF in executing a search and arrest warrant.
Source: Americans for Safe Access (San Diego)
Labels:
co-op,
collective,
dispensary,
helping hands,
medical marijuana,
raid,
san diego
Monday, September 27, 2010
NEWS: Upland medical marijuana co-ops file with state Supreme Court
UPLAND - Medical marijuana cooperatives fighting the city to stay open are looking to the state Supreme Court for help.
An attorney representing three cooperatives in the city has filed a petition for review and an application for a stay with the state Supreme Court in San Francisco.
The city shut down the cooperatives because its zoning ordinance does not allow such facilities to operate.
G3 Holistic, Upland Herbal Patient Cooperative and Old World Solutions were shut down Aug. 13 after a preliminary injunction was awarded to the city by Judge Barry Plotkin at West Valley Superior Court in Rancho Cucamonga.
"The Court of Appeal declined summarily so now they're taking another bite at the apple, so to speak, seeking the Supreme Court opinion," Upland City Attorney William Curley said. "We're feeling pretty confident the court would uphold Judge Plotkin and his position, but certainly we'll see. It's certainly their right to seek the high level of review."
A request similar to the one sent to the state Supreme Court has been rejected by the Court of Appeal in Riverside.
"We have no ruling and we're hoping the Supreme Court will get involved," said Roger Jon Diamond, the attorney representing the three cooperatives. "It's difficult to get the attention of the Supreme Court because they're busy with a lot of cases, and they ordinarily don't like to take cases until there's been a few decisions by a Court of Appeal."
Diamond filed a petition for a stay with the Court of Appeal in Riverside, but it was denied, which led to the Supreme Court filing.
"The Court of Appeal, without giving any reason and with no explanation, denied our petition," Diamond said. "That order from the Court of Appeal filed Sept. 9 is what we're challenging in the Supreme Court."
Plotkin granted the injunction to the city after an opinion was made by an appeals court in Santa Ana regarding a similar case in Anaheim.
The case involved an Anaheim-based cooperative - Qualified Patients Association - that had sued the city of Anaheim in 2007. The city had attempted to implement an ordinance banning all dispensaries.
A dispensary is a for-profit entity that provides medical marijuana to qualified patients. A cooperative is a nonprofit that provides medical marijuana in a shop-like setting.
The opinion, published Aug. 18, was expected to address whether cities have the right to ban cooperatives, but the court ordered that part back to trial court for more hearings.
However, the court determined that California's Compassionate Use Act of 1996, which decriminalized medical marijuana, trumps federal law when cities attempt to ban dispensaries based on federal law. Federal law considers growing and using marijuana to be illegal. A footnote in the ruling went against an argument used by Anaheim attorneys.
The city of Upland relied on the same cases to argue for a preliminary injunction on the cooperatives.
"All of those that are representing cities or are on our side of the fence, so to speak, don't see that the Qualified Patients' case did anything to alter the status quo," Curley said. "Those in favor of the marijuana vending read into the footnotes and see a whole bunch of things that they cling to to say they're right."
Officials from the cooperatives announced they may present settlement terms to the city. Curley said he has not seen the terms and could not comment on them.
But, he said, the city does not intend to stop enforcing its ordinance.
Cooperatives "are prohibited. There's no middle ground, Curley said. "So if we have a proposal that says `Let us be open every other day,' there is no middle ground other than `you're not allowed.' I'm not sure what the proposal is, but, if and when we get it, we'll fairly look at it."
Officials from the cooperatives are also gathering signatures for a petition that could bring the issue up for vote in Upland. They will need about 3,500 signatures from registered voters in the city to get a measure on a ballot that would ask whether cooperatives can operate in the city under certain guidelines.
"The city is spending a lot of money fighting," Diamond said. "I don't know what their hang-up is. I mean, it seems to me that it is a crime not to allow someone undergoing chemotherapy whose nauseous, whose doctor recommends marijuana - it's a crime for the city to say you can't do it here in Upland."
Source: Inland Valley Daily Bulletin
An attorney representing three cooperatives in the city has filed a petition for review and an application for a stay with the state Supreme Court in San Francisco.
The city shut down the cooperatives because its zoning ordinance does not allow such facilities to operate.
G3 Holistic, Upland Herbal Patient Cooperative and Old World Solutions were shut down Aug. 13 after a preliminary injunction was awarded to the city by Judge Barry Plotkin at West Valley Superior Court in Rancho Cucamonga.
"The Court of Appeal declined summarily so now they're taking another bite at the apple, so to speak, seeking the Supreme Court opinion," Upland City Attorney William Curley said. "We're feeling pretty confident the court would uphold Judge Plotkin and his position, but certainly we'll see. It's certainly their right to seek the high level of review."
A request similar to the one sent to the state Supreme Court has been rejected by the Court of Appeal in Riverside.
"We have no ruling and we're hoping the Supreme Court will get involved," said Roger Jon Diamond, the attorney representing the three cooperatives. "It's difficult to get the attention of the Supreme Court because they're busy with a lot of cases, and they ordinarily don't like to take cases until there's been a few decisions by a Court of Appeal."
Diamond filed a petition for a stay with the Court of Appeal in Riverside, but it was denied, which led to the Supreme Court filing.
"The Court of Appeal, without giving any reason and with no explanation, denied our petition," Diamond said. "That order from the Court of Appeal filed Sept. 9 is what we're challenging in the Supreme Court."
Plotkin granted the injunction to the city after an opinion was made by an appeals court in Santa Ana regarding a similar case in Anaheim.
The case involved an Anaheim-based cooperative - Qualified Patients Association - that had sued the city of Anaheim in 2007. The city had attempted to implement an ordinance banning all dispensaries.
A dispensary is a for-profit entity that provides medical marijuana to qualified patients. A cooperative is a nonprofit that provides medical marijuana in a shop-like setting.
The opinion, published Aug. 18, was expected to address whether cities have the right to ban cooperatives, but the court ordered that part back to trial court for more hearings.
However, the court determined that California's Compassionate Use Act of 1996, which decriminalized medical marijuana, trumps federal law when cities attempt to ban dispensaries based on federal law. Federal law considers growing and using marijuana to be illegal. A footnote in the ruling went against an argument used by Anaheim attorneys.
The city of Upland relied on the same cases to argue for a preliminary injunction on the cooperatives.
"All of those that are representing cities or are on our side of the fence, so to speak, don't see that the Qualified Patients' case did anything to alter the status quo," Curley said. "Those in favor of the marijuana vending read into the footnotes and see a whole bunch of things that they cling to to say they're right."
Officials from the cooperatives announced they may present settlement terms to the city. Curley said he has not seen the terms and could not comment on them.
But, he said, the city does not intend to stop enforcing its ordinance.
Cooperatives "are prohibited. There's no middle ground, Curley said. "So if we have a proposal that says `Let us be open every other day,' there is no middle ground other than `you're not allowed.' I'm not sure what the proposal is, but, if and when we get it, we'll fairly look at it."
Officials from the cooperatives are also gathering signatures for a petition that could bring the issue up for vote in Upland. They will need about 3,500 signatures from registered voters in the city to get a measure on a ballot that would ask whether cooperatives can operate in the city under certain guidelines.
"The city is spending a lot of money fighting," Diamond said. "I don't know what their hang-up is. I mean, it seems to me that it is a crime not to allow someone undergoing chemotherapy whose nauseous, whose doctor recommends marijuana - it's a crime for the city to say you can't do it here in Upland."
Source: Inland Valley Daily Bulletin
Labels:
co-op,
cooperative,
medical marijuana,
supreme court,
upland
Wednesday, September 15, 2010
NEWS: Marijuana Co-ops To Roll Dice
Lottery numbers have been issued to 43 nonprofit medical marijuana collectives in Long Beach, and those collectives’ names have been released. On Monday, each will find out its lottery fate.
A lottery system was implemented to resolve the last bit of Municipal Code 5.87 — the fact that collectives are not allowed to operate within 1,000 feet of one another. All other sections of the law officially went into effect on Aug. 29.
Names and addresses of the collectives that will be a part of the lottery have been compiled on the city’s Web site, www.longbeach.gov/finance/business_relations/medical_marijuana.asp.
During the lottery, each collective’s number that is pulled gives that collective preference in regards to the 1,000-feet requirement over any other pulled afterwards.
“So now, Sept. 20 — 3 p.m., City Council chambers — is the day of the lottery,” said Erik Sund, the city’s business relations manager. “We are preparing ourselves. We are going to be ready for it. That is the day we’ll theoretically pull the lottery numbers and implement the next step of the ordinance.”
According to Sund, from 30 to 35 collectives are expected to move forward out of the lottery. After that, the city will have 60 days to complete inspections, public noticing and to conduct final permit hearings.
“They have to pass all of those hurdles before they actually get that permit in hand,” he said.
Previously, Sund had estimated that about 95 collectives existed within Long Beach before Municipal Code 5.87 went into effect. The new law was going to eliminate more than 50% of those collectives due to the restrictions on how close they could be to schools. Under the law, collectives cannot operate within 1,000 feet of any school servicing grades kindergarten through eighth grade and collectives cannot operate within 1,500 feet of high schools.
Before the original June 18 deadline for accepting applications, Sund said he received 54 requests for a permit. That number has since shrunk to 49 — six of which are for separate cultivation sites — so 43 collectives in total.
“Five applications were deemed incomplete, resulting in 49 potential cultivation and collection sites going into the process,” Sund said.
Each request for a permit requires an application fee of between $10,000 and $30,000, depending on how large the collective is.
Only one lottery number was given to collectives that had a separate cultivation site application. If that number is drawn, both the collective and cultivation sites are considered together when applying the 1,000-foot standard, Sund said.
Whether a collective is disqualified before or during the lottery, that collective will not receive its application money back.
“The ordinance was very clear that the application fee was non-refundable,” Sund added.
Sund also said that there should be no fears of any one owner taking advantage of the lottery system, because the ordinance does not allow for the same owner or director to apply for different collectives.
“I can’t apply for multiple locations,” he said. “I can apply for a collective to distribute my marijuana and also a cultivation site on which to grow my marijuana. Referring to the ordinance, it says you can’t be a manager member for a number of different collectives.”
Despite public accusations and protests from a disqualified collective claiming that its money was taken disingenuously and a lawsuit pending from another regarding the school restrictions, Sund said the application period has gone relatively well.
“I think the process is running pretty smoothly,” he said. “I think we’ve been able to handle it.”
Source: Gazette Newspapers
A lottery system was implemented to resolve the last bit of Municipal Code 5.87 — the fact that collectives are not allowed to operate within 1,000 feet of one another. All other sections of the law officially went into effect on Aug. 29.
Names and addresses of the collectives that will be a part of the lottery have been compiled on the city’s Web site, www.longbeach.gov/finance/business_relations/medical_marijuana.asp.
During the lottery, each collective’s number that is pulled gives that collective preference in regards to the 1,000-feet requirement over any other pulled afterwards.
“So now, Sept. 20 — 3 p.m., City Council chambers — is the day of the lottery,” said Erik Sund, the city’s business relations manager. “We are preparing ourselves. We are going to be ready for it. That is the day we’ll theoretically pull the lottery numbers and implement the next step of the ordinance.”
According to Sund, from 30 to 35 collectives are expected to move forward out of the lottery. After that, the city will have 60 days to complete inspections, public noticing and to conduct final permit hearings.
“They have to pass all of those hurdles before they actually get that permit in hand,” he said.
Previously, Sund had estimated that about 95 collectives existed within Long Beach before Municipal Code 5.87 went into effect. The new law was going to eliminate more than 50% of those collectives due to the restrictions on how close they could be to schools. Under the law, collectives cannot operate within 1,000 feet of any school servicing grades kindergarten through eighth grade and collectives cannot operate within 1,500 feet of high schools.
Before the original June 18 deadline for accepting applications, Sund said he received 54 requests for a permit. That number has since shrunk to 49 — six of which are for separate cultivation sites — so 43 collectives in total.
“Five applications were deemed incomplete, resulting in 49 potential cultivation and collection sites going into the process,” Sund said.
Each request for a permit requires an application fee of between $10,000 and $30,000, depending on how large the collective is.
Only one lottery number was given to collectives that had a separate cultivation site application. If that number is drawn, both the collective and cultivation sites are considered together when applying the 1,000-foot standard, Sund said.
Whether a collective is disqualified before or during the lottery, that collective will not receive its application money back.
“The ordinance was very clear that the application fee was non-refundable,” Sund added.
Sund also said that there should be no fears of any one owner taking advantage of the lottery system, because the ordinance does not allow for the same owner or director to apply for different collectives.
“I can’t apply for multiple locations,” he said. “I can apply for a collective to distribute my marijuana and also a cultivation site on which to grow my marijuana. Referring to the ordinance, it says you can’t be a manager member for a number of different collectives.”
Despite public accusations and protests from a disqualified collective claiming that its money was taken disingenuously and a lawsuit pending from another regarding the school restrictions, Sund said the application period has gone relatively well.
“I think the process is running pretty smoothly,” he said. “I think we’ve been able to handle it.”
Source: Gazette Newspapers
Labels:
co-op,
collectives,
dispensaries,
long beach,
lottery,
medical marijuana
Tuesday, August 18, 2009
Lake Forest Dispensaries, Collectives and Co-ops
« Back
Calicollective LF (DELIVERY)
Lake Forest, CA 92630
Phone: (949) 226-7197
Hours: Mon-Sun 11am-1am
Lake Forest Alternative Center
22471 Aspan St. Ste 207 Lake Forest, CA 92630 [map]
Phone: (949) 458-2500
Hours: Mon-Sat 9:30am-7pm, Sun-CLOSED
Lake Forest Patients Collective Association [map]
24602 Raymond Way Suite 208, Lake Forest, CA 92630
Phone: (949) 455-9300
The Health Collective
24602 Raymond Way Suite 210 Lake Forest, CA 92630
Phone: (949) 294-8574
Hours: Mon-Sat 9am-8pm, Sun 10am-7pm
Covers the following zip codes in Lake Forest, California: 92609, 92610, 92630, 92679
Calicollective LF (DELIVERY)
Lake Forest, CA 92630
Phone: (949) 226-7197
Hours: Mon-Sun 11am-1am
Lake Forest Alternative Center
22471 Aspan St. Ste 207 Lake Forest, CA 92630 [map]
Phone: (949) 458-2500
Hours: Mon-Sat 9:30am-7pm, Sun-CLOSED
Lake Forest Patients Collective Association [map]
24602 Raymond Way Suite 208, Lake Forest, CA 92630
Phone: (949) 455-9300
The Health Collective
24602 Raymond Way Suite 210 Lake Forest, CA 92630
Phone: (949) 294-8574
Hours: Mon-Sat 9am-8pm, Sun 10am-7pm
Covers the following zip codes in Lake Forest, California: 92609, 92610, 92630, 92679
Labels:
co-op,
dispensary,
lake forest dispensaries,
medical marijuana
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)