6:15am | As the Long Beach City Council has inched towards passing an ordinance regulating local medical marijuana businesses, some local collectives worry that the tables are being shifted in a direction that leads to unnecessary regulation akin to a recent ordinance passed by the City of Los Angeles.
Long Beach lobbyist Carl Kemp of the Kemp Group – who represents about ten local medpot dispensaries – says that supporters of medical marijuana collectives have not been allowed ample discussion and presentation time in front of the City Council.
His beliefs stem mainly from Mayor Bob Foster’s decision to offer public speakers on the issue two minutes to address the Council, instead of the normal three minutes, because that particular City Council meeting was running long. In addition, Kemp said Thursday, the Mayor’s office invited Los Angeles District Attorney Steve Cooley – notorious for his hard stance against medical marijuana dispensaries – to address the Council during their upcoming Tuesday meeting.
Kemp made numerous attempts to secure equal time for a presentation, but had not heard back from the Mayor’s office with a response.
“You give [Cooley’s office] a platform to make their argument before a vote, and you don’t give anyone else the opportunity to give a counterpoint?” Kemp says. “That flies in the face of democracy, and it flies in the face of this argument that you’re trying to make sure that things are done right. You’re trying to make sure, in my view, that these things are done in the most restrictive way, and all but eliminate them from being in this city, when you’ve already agreed that they are medicine.”
In Kemp’s eyes, both moves could slow momentum that seemed to be leaning toward the approval of an ordinance that both the City and medical marijuana dispensaries agreed on. Restricting the allotted public speaking time and inviting an outside legal opinion are a hindrance, he says, to the hard work that has already gone into crafting a very intricate ordinance that seems to hold a majority Council vote to approve.
Taylor Honrath, a legislative aide to Mayor Foster, said that next Tuesday’s presentation would be made by staff from Cooley’s office and not the District Attorney himself, and that the intention is not to shift the Council’s decision one way or another but simply to share similar experiences with crafting an ordinance in Los Angeles and how it relates to the process in Long Beach.
Long Beach’s proposed ordinance is viewed as more collective-friendly than the one adopted by Los Angeles just a few weeks ago. Some collectives have threatened to sue Los Angeles for being too restrictive. In the past, District Attorney Cooley has promised to specifically target marijuana dispensaries for prosecution and publicly pleaded with the Los Angeles City Council to ban all sales.
“Their experiences with regulation, I imagine, will be part of the discussion and how Long Beach fits into the County,” Honrath said. “The District Attorney’s office isn’t coming in here to deliver an anti-collective message.”
Honrath said that the exact meeting agenda had not yet been finalized, but that worries from Kemp and his collective clients were unnecessary. The presentation from Cooley’s staff will not represent either viewpoint, he says.
Kemp says that he believes the City Council has been “extremely progressive” with their willingness to work fairly with medical marijuana dispensaries on several key issues. While there are several areas that he believes could be improved upon, Kemp said that overall his clients are pleased with the ordinance that has been crafted and seems close to Council approval.
The City Council was scheduled to issue a final vote on the ordinance during last Tuesday’s meeting, but the Mayor delayed the vote by one week, expressing concerns that dispensaries would not be required to grow their own marijuana on their property or purchase it within city limits – even though the City Council voted 5-4 the week prior not to regulate purchasing restrictions.
Foster says that the city may be making itself vulnerable by allowing dispensaries to purchase their marijuana from anywhere without restriction. But Kemp says that forcing them to grow on their own property would be near impossible with the water and heating demands that the plants require.
“If I were a property owner in Long Beach, I wouldn’t want medical marijuana grown in my property,” Kemp says. “Not because of any philosophical view, but because of what it might do to my building.”
In addition, Kemp says, requiring marijuana to be locally grown creates a safety risk because such places are commonly broken into. He expressed concern that those opposed to the ordinance had been proposing more restrictions in recent weeks, capped off by the Mayor postponing a final Council vote by one week in order to allow the office of a famously opinionated District Attorney to make a presentation.
Kemp says he understands the concern that Mexican drug cartels could benefit by selling marijuana to the dispensaries, but proposes that the ordinance include a regulation that they must purchase the product within the state of California and not specifically in Long Beach.
Source: LBPOST.com
If you know of an event that you feel should be listed on our calendar, please send details to info@mjdispensaries.com ~Thank You
Showing posts with label la medical marijuana ordinance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label la medical marijuana ordinance. Show all posts
Friday, February 12, 2010
Thursday, February 11, 2010
VIDEO: Police Chief Blair talks about on-site cultivation of marijuana at Long Beach Council Meeting
February 2, 2010 Long Beach City Council Meeting: Long Beach Police Chief Blair talks about on-site cultivation restrictions for medical marijuana collectives at LB City Council Meeting. Also some comments from City Attorney Robert E. Shannon.
More city council videos on the topic medical marijuana »
Sunday, February 7, 2010
Wednesday, February 3, 2010
Saturday, January 30, 2010
OP-ED: L.A.'s medical marijuana troubles hold lessons
The Obama administration gave Hawaii and other states that have legalized medical marijuana the freedom to go forward with their efforts to make it available to patients. The Legislature should provide for a distribution system with safeguards to protect against the kind of carnival atmosphere that has jarred Los Angeles.
U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder announced last October that the Justice Department would not waste energy prosecuting patients who use marijuana for medical purposes. The George W. Bush administration had hounded such state-allowed operations, mainly in California.
The Los Angeles City Council this week approved an ordinance that is expected to shut down 80 percent of the city's nearly 1,000 medical marijuana dispensaries. The action came after community groups had long complained about the numerous dispensaries near residential neighborhoods, schools and parks.
"These are out of control," said Councilman Ed Reyes, whose committee oversaw the writing of the ordinance. "Our city has more of these than Starbucks."
At the same time, Colorado state legislators are considering a bill that would bar doctors from working out of dispensaries or offering discounts to patients who agree to use a particular dispensary. It also would prohibit dispensaries within 1,000 feet of schools, day cares and other dispensaries, similar to the Los Angeles proposal that the mayor is expected to sign.
Hawaii legalized marijuana for medical purposes a decade ago. However, in the absence of medical marijuana dispensaries, the state's more than 4,000 patients have had to obtain marijuana from drug traffickers.
The medical marijuana program has been assigned to the Department of Public Safety's narcotics division, which has been accused of violating privacy by releasing the identities of patients and doctors.
Gov. Linda Lingle has ignored 2009 legislation directing her to create a task force at finding a way for patients to acquire it legally. Her administration has insisted on adhering to the federal law that the Justice Department has decided to ignore.
Bills before this year's Legislature would place the medical marijuana program under the Department of Health, where it belongs. Marijuana has been found to be effective in easing pain from such diseases at AIDS, cancer and multiple sclerosis. The department would license producers and dispensers.
The proposal importantly would create a task force assigned with developing a distribution system and identifying requirements for the licensing of producers and production facilities. The Los Angeles experience should be helpful in determining how such a system should operate.
Source: Star Bulletin
U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder announced last October that the Justice Department would not waste energy prosecuting patients who use marijuana for medical purposes. The George W. Bush administration had hounded such state-allowed operations, mainly in California.
The Los Angeles City Council this week approved an ordinance that is expected to shut down 80 percent of the city's nearly 1,000 medical marijuana dispensaries. The action came after community groups had long complained about the numerous dispensaries near residential neighborhoods, schools and parks.
"These are out of control," said Councilman Ed Reyes, whose committee oversaw the writing of the ordinance. "Our city has more of these than Starbucks."
At the same time, Colorado state legislators are considering a bill that would bar doctors from working out of dispensaries or offering discounts to patients who agree to use a particular dispensary. It also would prohibit dispensaries within 1,000 feet of schools, day cares and other dispensaries, similar to the Los Angeles proposal that the mayor is expected to sign.
Hawaii legalized marijuana for medical purposes a decade ago. However, in the absence of medical marijuana dispensaries, the state's more than 4,000 patients have had to obtain marijuana from drug traffickers.
The medical marijuana program has been assigned to the Department of Public Safety's narcotics division, which has been accused of violating privacy by releasing the identities of patients and doctors.
Gov. Linda Lingle has ignored 2009 legislation directing her to create a task force at finding a way for patients to acquire it legally. Her administration has insisted on adhering to the federal law that the Justice Department has decided to ignore.
Bills before this year's Legislature would place the medical marijuana program under the Department of Health, where it belongs. Marijuana has been found to be effective in easing pain from such diseases at AIDS, cancer and multiple sclerosis. The department would license producers and dispensers.
The proposal importantly would create a task force assigned with developing a distribution system and identifying requirements for the licensing of producers and production facilities. The Los Angeles experience should be helpful in determining how such a system should operate.
Source: Star Bulletin
Sunday, January 10, 2010
Friday, December 25, 2009
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
